Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Point Buy Balanced?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lakesidefantasy" data-source="post: 9835928" data-attributes="member: 6682043"><p>In the end, I think the Point Buy method is balanced. It seems to me that the team who put together Dungeons and Dragons 5e did the math and put some thought into it. They balanced the Point Buy method against the Standard method.</p><p></p><p>The rules for generating ability scores on page 13 give us as Players, two options; the Standard method and, "If you...don't like the idea of randomly determining ability scores," the Standard Array.°</p><p></p><p>I was surprised when Fifth Edition came out. I was anxious and I immediately turned to the page on generating ability scores when I first got the book. At that time in 2014, Fight Club was raging, and it certainly seemed that they might remove the Standard method from the game, or make it a mere alternative method.</p><p></p><p>However, no, they didn't. Instead they adjusted the point buy scale so that we payed a price for the control offered by the Point Buy method: a limited range from 8 to 15. This is the balance. </p><p></p><p>Previous to 5e the Point Buy method allowed you to buy all the way up to 18, which made it superior to The Standard method because we didn't have to sacrifice anything to get that control. </p><p></p><p>In my opinion Dungeons and Dragons 5e got it right.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>° I take it a step further and offer the Point Buy method as well, but I also ask that Players just give the Standard method a shot. If they don't like what they rolled, they can use one of the other methods. I also offer my Dice Point method but they might have to commit to that one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lakesidefantasy, post: 9835928, member: 6682043"] In the end, I think the Point Buy method is balanced. It seems to me that the team who put together Dungeons and Dragons 5e did the math and put some thought into it. They balanced the Point Buy method against the Standard method. The rules for generating ability scores on page 13 give us as Players, two options; the Standard method and, "If you...don't like the idea of randomly determining ability scores," the Standard Array.° I was surprised when Fifth Edition came out. I was anxious and I immediately turned to the page on generating ability scores when I first got the book. At that time in 2014, Fight Club was raging, and it certainly seemed that they might remove the Standard method from the game, or make it a mere alternative method. However, no, they didn't. Instead they adjusted the point buy scale so that we payed a price for the control offered by the Point Buy method: a limited range from 8 to 15. This is the balance. Previous to 5e the Point Buy method allowed you to buy all the way up to 18, which made it superior to The Standard method because we didn't have to sacrifice anything to get that control. In my opinion Dungeons and Dragons 5e got it right. ° I take it a step further and offer the Point Buy method as well, but I also ask that Players just give the Standard method a shot. If they don't like what they rolled, they can use one of the other methods. I also offer my Dice Point method but they might have to commit to that one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Point Buy Balanced?
Top