Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 223795" data-attributes="member: 2829">This should be reversed.  According to the SRD, a Bag of Holding is non-dimensional, while a Portable Hole is extradimensional.But it gets better. Both the SRD and the DMG then contradict themselves about the Portable Hole. Check it out...The above quote can be found in the second paragraph of the item description, just after the air bit. Cute, isn't it? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Yes. You're correct, partially. The Bags of Holding do indeed have a cubic foot limit, as does a Portable Hole. However, as I mentioned above, the Portable Hole does not have a weight limit, only a cubic foot limit. In fact, no matter how much you place in the Portable Hole, it never has any notable weight at all. The lack of a weight limit is what initially caught my eye.I can't argue that. Thanks for pointing out the cubic foot limit with the Bags of Holding. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I'm nearly inclined to agree.</blockquote>