Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is "Shield" too powerful?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4429986" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>This is important why? Why is slowing up the game to ask the PC's defense a lot a GOOD way to play?</p><p></p><p>And, my way does not preclude the DM asking the player his defense. It precludes the player asking the DM "How much was I hit by?".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This happens anyway, even with your preferred set of rules. The player has to take out the time to make the decision anyway (a minor attack early in the encounter might or might not be important to block).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Funny. That is not annoying to my DM who keeps track of PC defenses all of the time and has since day one. I could see where a given DM does not want to know the defenses of his players, but that wastes game time asking.</p><p></p><p>Which is annoying. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A matter of opinion. The poor entitled player does not know everything. boo hoo <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/cry.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":.-(" title="Cry :.-(" data-shortname=":.-(" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This corner case is mostly irrelevent to the conversation. The number of Wizard template monsters is extremely low in most campaigns. The Wizard gets to use Shield hundreds of times. The monsters in most campaigns hardly get to use it at all.</p><p></p><p>This is hardly a serious advantage for the monsters (who btw don't care anyway). And, it assumes that the DM takes advantage of this metagaming information for his monsters.</p><p></p><p>You seem to be picking at very small straws here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4429986, member: 2011"] This is important why? Why is slowing up the game to ask the PC's defense a lot a GOOD way to play? And, my way does not preclude the DM asking the player his defense. It precludes the player asking the DM "How much was I hit by?". This happens anyway, even with your preferred set of rules. The player has to take out the time to make the decision anyway (a minor attack early in the encounter might or might not be important to block). Funny. That is not annoying to my DM who keeps track of PC defenses all of the time and has since day one. I could see where a given DM does not want to know the defenses of his players, but that wastes game time asking. Which is annoying. :lol: A matter of opinion. The poor entitled player does not know everything. boo hoo :.-( This corner case is mostly irrelevent to the conversation. The number of Wizard template monsters is extremely low in most campaigns. The Wizard gets to use Shield hundreds of times. The monsters in most campaigns hardly get to use it at all. This is hardly a serious advantage for the monsters (who btw don't care anyway). And, it assumes that the DM takes advantage of this metagaming information for his monsters. You seem to be picking at very small straws here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is "Shield" too powerful?
Top