Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is "Shield" too powerful?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4430292" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>I kept ignoring it because it is irrelevant. If I must prove it to you, ...</p><p></p><p>1) The June 2008 podcast where David Noonan DMs, he never does what you claim. He asks players what the AC is of their PCs are and even says that he will be asking this question every 10 seconds or so.</p><p></p><p>2) In the Wyatt podcasts, the players do not appear to know anything about how to play 4E. So, that cannot be used as standard game play (like you claim). He also states that he misses or he hits on occassion without stating what AC or defense he achieved.</p><p></p><p>3) On the Chris Perkins podcasts, he does what David Noonan does and what James Wyatt does. He appears to change around. This is also a session with players that do not know 4E.</p><p></p><p>Different DM strokes for different WotC designers. It also seems that the DMs are doing it this way because they are training and because they are not familiar with the PCs defenses.</p><p></p><p>Your point is here is not rules and is basically irrelevant to the rules discussion. It's DM preference. Even WotC designers DM differently and they sometimes even DM differently based on what they roll on the dice.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You can take a poll to ask how many DMs have PCs defenses written down, how many ask their players what their defenses are, and how many call out their to hit total and ask if it hits. I suspect the latter will be a very small percentage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4430292, member: 2011"] I kept ignoring it because it is irrelevant. If I must prove it to you, ... 1) The June 2008 podcast where David Noonan DMs, he never does what you claim. He asks players what the AC is of their PCs are and even says that he will be asking this question every 10 seconds or so. 2) In the Wyatt podcasts, the players do not appear to know anything about how to play 4E. So, that cannot be used as standard game play (like you claim). He also states that he misses or he hits on occassion without stating what AC or defense he achieved. 3) On the Chris Perkins podcasts, he does what David Noonan does and what James Wyatt does. He appears to change around. This is also a session with players that do not know 4E. Different DM strokes for different WotC designers. It also seems that the DMs are doing it this way because they are training and because they are not familiar with the PCs defenses. Your point is here is not rules and is basically irrelevant to the rules discussion. It's DM preference. Even WotC designers DM differently and they sometimes even DM differently based on what they roll on the dice. You can take a poll to ask how many DMs have PCs defenses written down, how many ask their players what their defenses are, and how many call out their to hit total and ask if it hits. I suspect the latter will be a very small percentage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is "Shield" too powerful?
Top