Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4692545" data-attributes="member: 2011">Whatever.Prove your point.You did not disprove my math, you just yelled about it.Put down real math, not that pseudo math you wrote before.Prove 1 and 2a through 2e are flawed, or walk away with your tail between your legs.I've already illustrated how your 25% is accurate, but meaningless. Prove me wrong.Show real math to illustrate average damage under 1, and 2a through 2e.I'll wait.So far, your pseudo math is lacking.The proof is in the pudding. Give an example of average damage for each of the cases I layed out if you want to prove your point.You are aware that you too could be in error and "married to your ideas".Do the math instead of the hyperbole.Average damage is the key to this. It makes or breaks these types of math arguments. Remember, neither of these defenses trigger unless an attack hits, so you must start with a case of the attack hits. Anything else is blowing smoke.If you cannot do it, we'll all pretty much assume you are mistaken.</blockquote>