Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is "Spellcasting Prodigy" feat too powerful?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pax" data-source="post: 602288" data-attributes="member: 6875"><p><strong>Re: Re: Re: Re</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, 32 points to buy with is NOT all that high. <strong>Yes</strong>, if your group is filled with unrepentant munchkins, they will buy highly two-dimensional attribute spreads (and likely not buy much, if ANY, charisma other than for paladins, sorcerors, and some clerics ... a DEAD giveaway, that ...).</p><p></p><p>Here, look:</p><p></p><p>25-point buy:</p><p>18 (cost 16, spent so far 16)</p><p>10 (cost 2, spent so far 18)</p><p>10 (cost 2, spent so far 20)</p><p>10 (cost 2, spent so far 22)</p><p>10 (cost 2, spent so far 24)</p><p>9 (cost 1, spent so far 25)</p><p></p><p>... I don't see a single "8" in there. Granted the charater is fairly one-dimensional in terms of attributes, but that's not needfully a BAD thing.</p><p></p><p>32-point buy:</p><p>18 (cost 16, spent so far 16)</p><p>14 (cost 6, spent so far 22)</p><p>12 (cost 2, spent so far 26)</p><p>10 (cost 2, spent so far 28)</p><p>10 (cost 2, spent so far 30)</p><p>10 (cost 2, spent so far 32)</p><p></p><p>Still no 8's ... mainly because only the one 18 was bought. For a spellcaster ... 18 in primary, 14 in Dexterity, and 12 in, oh ... Constitution perhaps. Well, a Cleric might want 12 Dex and 14 Charisma, due to Turning issues.</p><p></p><p>Then again, their "average power level" 25-point buy actually SHORTS you a lot. 4d6-drop-the-lowest means for a higher average than that method gives you.</p><p></p><p>There are 6^4 (or 1296) permutations of possible results. I don't have the right sort of calculator, nor maths, to calculate how many ways there are to roll EVERY single possible result. But for an example, there is precisely ONE die result that will give you a 3 (1, 1, 1, and 1). There are <strong>twenty one</strong> ways to roll an 18 (please, just trust me on this ... I don't want to clutter this thread up listing them ALL).</p><p></p><p>Obviously the bell curve is shifted well to the higher end. I once calculated this out fairly well, and determined (for example) that more than two thirds of all PC's generated using 4d6-and-drop will have <strong>at lest</strong> one score of 16 or higher.</p><p></p><p>Contrast that to the "my highest is a 15" for the "standard set" that accompanies the 25-point-buy method. IIRC, I pegged the bell curve peaking between 13.4 and 13.9. The "standard spread" in NO way gives an average of roughly 13.5 to 14, not even close. Nor can a 25-point buy do so; spread evenly, 25 points buys just over a 12 average (with a single point left over) ... barely more than the THREE-dice methods of old used to generate.</p><p></p><p>Whereas a 32-point buy will produce six 13's, with 2 points left over ... which is more in keeping with what the standard method should produce. Now consider that the point-buy system ALREADY makes higher attributes slightly less attractive, by increasing the per-point purchase rate (it costs 16 points to get an 18, and only 6 points to get a 14).</p><p></p><p>All in all, I consider the point-buy limits listed in the DMG to be one step <strong>below</strong> what they are billed as. Therefor, I pesonally use 25 for low-power gaming, <strong>35 for medium-power,</strong> and 45 for high-power.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pax, post: 602288, member: 6875"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re[/b] Actually, 32 points to buy with is NOT all that high. [b]Yes[/b], if your group is filled with unrepentant munchkins, they will buy highly two-dimensional attribute spreads (and likely not buy much, if ANY, charisma other than for paladins, sorcerors, and some clerics ... a DEAD giveaway, that ...). Here, look: 25-point buy: 18 (cost 16, spent so far 16) 10 (cost 2, spent so far 18) 10 (cost 2, spent so far 20) 10 (cost 2, spent so far 22) 10 (cost 2, spent so far 24) 9 (cost 1, spent so far 25) ... I don't see a single "8" in there. Granted the charater is fairly one-dimensional in terms of attributes, but that's not needfully a BAD thing. 32-point buy: 18 (cost 16, spent so far 16) 14 (cost 6, spent so far 22) 12 (cost 2, spent so far 26) 10 (cost 2, spent so far 28) 10 (cost 2, spent so far 30) 10 (cost 2, spent so far 32) Still no 8's ... mainly because only the one 18 was bought. For a spellcaster ... 18 in primary, 14 in Dexterity, and 12 in, oh ... Constitution perhaps. Well, a Cleric might want 12 Dex and 14 Charisma, due to Turning issues. Then again, their "average power level" 25-point buy actually SHORTS you a lot. 4d6-drop-the-lowest means for a higher average than that method gives you. There are 6^4 (or 1296) permutations of possible results. I don't have the right sort of calculator, nor maths, to calculate how many ways there are to roll EVERY single possible result. But for an example, there is precisely ONE die result that will give you a 3 (1, 1, 1, and 1). There are [b]twenty one[/b] ways to roll an 18 (please, just trust me on this ... I don't want to clutter this thread up listing them ALL). Obviously the bell curve is shifted well to the higher end. I once calculated this out fairly well, and determined (for example) that more than two thirds of all PC's generated using 4d6-and-drop will have [b]at lest[/b] one score of 16 or higher. Contrast that to the "my highest is a 15" for the "standard set" that accompanies the 25-point-buy method. IIRC, I pegged the bell curve peaking between 13.4 and 13.9. The "standard spread" in NO way gives an average of roughly 13.5 to 14, not even close. Nor can a 25-point buy do so; spread evenly, 25 points buys just over a 12 average (with a single point left over) ... barely more than the THREE-dice methods of old used to generate. Whereas a 32-point buy will produce six 13's, with 2 points left over ... which is more in keeping with what the standard method should produce. Now consider that the point-buy system ALREADY makes higher attributes slightly less attractive, by increasing the per-point purchase rate (it costs 16 points to get an 18, and only 6 points to get a 14). All in all, I consider the point-buy limits listed in the DMG to be one step [b]below[/b] what they are billed as. Therefor, I pesonally use 25 for low-power gaming, [b]35 for medium-power,[/b] and 45 for high-power. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is "Spellcasting Prodigy" feat too powerful?
Top