Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is stoneskin underpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 6716875" data-attributes="member: 6701872"><p>It's a case of me saying "Some guys named Jim have red hair" and you hearing "every guy named Jim has red hair."</p><p></p><p>I am mentioning which sub-set of wizards would have their con score as their first our second priority, not making the claim all wizards within that subset have to have a high con score (though those that don't will need some other mitigation of concentration failure, or will not succeed very often in keeping their concentration)</p><p></p><p>Me saying "you don't even have to use concentration spells if you don't want to, and if you don't then your Con score isn't made a higher priority than it usually is" is not the same as me saying that a person not wanting their character to be good at concentration saves has to pick non-concentration saves. Such people can also choose to use concentration spells and not have their enjoyment of the character spoiled by failing a concentration check if it ever comes up. </p><p></p><p>I accept your apology, but I want you to know that I wasn't taking it personally and did not mean to sound as though I were assuming you were doing it on purpose.</p><p></p><p>That settles it for me, there is definitely something tangibly more civil about this forum than most others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AaronOfBarbaria, post: 6716875, member: 6701872"] It's a case of me saying "Some guys named Jim have red hair" and you hearing "every guy named Jim has red hair." I am mentioning which sub-set of wizards would have their con score as their first our second priority, not making the claim all wizards within that subset have to have a high con score (though those that don't will need some other mitigation of concentration failure, or will not succeed very often in keeping their concentration) Me saying "you don't even have to use concentration spells if you don't want to, and if you don't then your Con score isn't made a higher priority than it usually is" is not the same as me saying that a person not wanting their character to be good at concentration saves has to pick non-concentration saves. Such people can also choose to use concentration spells and not have their enjoyment of the character spoiled by failing a concentration check if it ever comes up. I accept your apology, but I want you to know that I wasn't taking it personally and did not mean to sound as though I were assuming you were doing it on purpose. That settles it for me, there is definitely something tangibly more civil about this forum than most others. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is stoneskin underpowered?
Top