Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Sunder a Standard Action or just something you can do any time you melee attack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 2951919" data-attributes="member: 3929"><p>I am suggesting that the only time you make a melee attack <em>action</em> is by using a Standard Action, yes. "Melee Attack" is a game term, and it is listed under Standard Acitons. It is seperate and distinct from Multiple Attacks (which references Full Attack Action).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It would work similar to Manyshot, per the core rules. Manyshot requires a standard action. Sunder requires a melee attack action, which is a Standard Action, and is not eligible for Multiple Attacks because of the lack of Footnote 7 and the lack of a text description allowing it as in Grapple.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not irrelevant, merely redundant.</p><p></p><p>Grapple has both footnote 7 and a text allowance, thus you may use it in iterative attacks.</p><p>Trip and Disarm have footnote 7, but no text allowance, so you may use it in iterative attacks.</p><p>Sunder has neither footnote 7 nor a text allowance, so you may not use it in iterative attacks.</p><p></p><p>If you're testing for the robustness of the text and table, assuming that one of them is wrong will show you that they are not robust at all; you assumed the problem into the system. But if you ask, "Assuming the text and the table are both correct, does this work?"</p><p></p><p>And it turns out that it does work.</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Sunder description refers to a game term defined as a Standard action pages earlier in the same chapter.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Table 8-2 defines Sunder as a standard action.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Footnote 7 allows actions that would normally require a Standard action by virtue of their using a melee attack action to replace iterative attacks gained by various means.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sunder lacks footnote 7, and so may not be used in iterative attacks.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sunder lacks a text allowance similar to Grapple's that would permit it to be used in iterative attacks.</li> </ul><p></p><p>So if the text and the table can work together without conflict, why assume the problem?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felix, post: 2951919, member: 3929"] I am suggesting that the only time you make a melee attack [i]action[/i] is by using a Standard Action, yes. "Melee Attack" is a game term, and it is listed under Standard Acitons. It is seperate and distinct from Multiple Attacks (which references Full Attack Action). It would work similar to Manyshot, per the core rules. Manyshot requires a standard action. Sunder requires a melee attack action, which is a Standard Action, and is not eligible for Multiple Attacks because of the lack of Footnote 7 and the lack of a text description allowing it as in Grapple. It is not irrelevant, merely redundant. Grapple has both footnote 7 and a text allowance, thus you may use it in iterative attacks. Trip and Disarm have footnote 7, but no text allowance, so you may use it in iterative attacks. Sunder has neither footnote 7 nor a text allowance, so you may not use it in iterative attacks. If you're testing for the robustness of the text and table, assuming that one of them is wrong will show you that they are not robust at all; you assumed the problem into the system. But if you ask, "Assuming the text and the table are both correct, does this work?" And it turns out that it does work. [list]The Sunder description refers to a game term defined as a Standard action pages earlier in the same chapter.[/list] [list]Table 8-2 defines Sunder as a standard action.[/list] [list]Footnote 7 allows actions that would normally require a Standard action by virtue of their using a melee attack action to replace iterative attacks gained by various means.[/list] [list]Sunder lacks footnote 7, and so may not be used in iterative attacks.[/list] [list]Sunder lacks a text allowance similar to Grapple's that would permit it to be used in iterative attacks.[/list] So if the text and the table can work together without conflict, why assume the problem? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Sunder a Standard Action or just something you can do any time you melee attack?
Top