Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Tasha's Broken?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Veltharis ap Rylix" data-source="post: 8607806" data-attributes="member: 66357"><p>Never really understood this viewpoint, because it's pretty much the opposite of how the matter appears to me.</p><p></p><p>Yes, it enables your hardcore char-op people to pick their package of racial traits while also getting their ASI of choice, but there are always going to be people looking to leverage their system mastery to gain as much player power as the rules allow, so lowering that ceiling doesn't change the fact that they will always aim to be at that ceiling. By contrast, people who don't have that level of system mastery still feel the selection pressure to align their racial ASIs with their class's primary ability scores - if you don't understand the system math well enough to be able to accurately judge how "necessary" that +2 is in the long run, all you're left with is the general knowledge that "higher numbers are better" and mountain upon mountain of online character creation guides telling you that any race without a +2 in what your class is good at is dead in the water.</p><p></p><p>You may not be "forced" to play a race with ASIs that align with your class, but there is a strong incentive to do so. Sure, you can play that orc wizard, but no matter what you do, it will take four extra levels (or eight, if using the pre-errata orc with the -2 INT penalty) before you're "as good" as you'd have been if you were playing an elf instead, and those class level ASIs you have to sink into INT to catch up could have gone into something else, like shoring up your CON score or taking a feat.</p><p></p><p>Floating racial ASIs eliminate that incentive and put every race on a level playing field, ability score wise. It's no longer mandatory that your orc wizard be dumber at level one than another player's elf wizard. You still have the option of playing with a non-optimal ability score array if you so choose, but people who just had a cool idea for an unorthodox race/class combo are no longer punished by default for picking it, and I think that the benefits for newer and less experienced players far outweigh the cost of letting optimizers eek out a bit more player power in a system for which, as you yourself note, it doesn't really make THAT much of a difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Veltharis ap Rylix, post: 8607806, member: 66357"] Never really understood this viewpoint, because it's pretty much the opposite of how the matter appears to me. Yes, it enables your hardcore char-op people to pick their package of racial traits while also getting their ASI of choice, but there are always going to be people looking to leverage their system mastery to gain as much player power as the rules allow, so lowering that ceiling doesn't change the fact that they will always aim to be at that ceiling. By contrast, people who don't have that level of system mastery still feel the selection pressure to align their racial ASIs with their class's primary ability scores - if you don't understand the system math well enough to be able to accurately judge how "necessary" that +2 is in the long run, all you're left with is the general knowledge that "higher numbers are better" and mountain upon mountain of online character creation guides telling you that any race without a +2 in what your class is good at is dead in the water. You may not be "forced" to play a race with ASIs that align with your class, but there is a strong incentive to do so. Sure, you can play that orc wizard, but no matter what you do, it will take four extra levels (or eight, if using the pre-errata orc with the -2 INT penalty) before you're "as good" as you'd have been if you were playing an elf instead, and those class level ASIs you have to sink into INT to catch up could have gone into something else, like shoring up your CON score or taking a feat. Floating racial ASIs eliminate that incentive and put every race on a level playing field, ability score wise. It's no longer mandatory that your orc wizard be dumber at level one than another player's elf wizard. You still have the option of playing with a non-optimal ability score array if you so choose, but people who just had a cool idea for an unorthodox race/class combo are no longer punished by default for picking it, and I think that the benefits for newer and less experienced players far outweigh the cost of letting optimizers eek out a bit more player power in a system for which, as you yourself note, it doesn't really make THAT much of a difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Tasha's Broken?
Top