Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bill Zebub" data-source="post: 8608779" data-attributes="member: 7031982">Right. The 5% more likely to hit does NOT mean that you hit 5% more often (unless you already were hitting 95% of the time, in which case it’s close.)Well, no.  "I have claimed" (which you have) is not the same as "it has been shown."  I don't know how you are defining "trivial", but that 20-30% equates to a similar reduction in number of rounds required to kill a target, even if you're just doing 1-2 additional points of damage per attack.  If you don't think that's important then you should definitely run with the 14 in your primary.So....are you claiming that a change of 0.00025 to 0.0001 is a useful analogy for understanding a change of 6.5 to 8.125?And, as is always the case in this debate, if the change is as small and trivial and irrelevant as you claim, then it also wouldn't provide a very meaningful differentiation between races, would it?Maybe we should use interest on savings as our analogy?</blockquote>