Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Tasha's Broken?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8609542" data-attributes="member: 7023887"><p>Some people think that the book has too much powercreep. Some people think that (outside of a few outliers) the book only gave "powercreep" to the classes/subclasses that needed it (Monks, Rangers, Sorcerers). </p><p></p><p>Some people think that Tasha's changes to racial ASIs are terrible and will destroy D&D's races and think that the only people that like them are munchkins/optimizers/powergamers. Some people like Tasha's changes to racial ASIs and have been using them in their games. Others don't personally like them but are okay with them existing. </p><p></p><p>Some people think that Twilight Clerics (and possibly Peace Domain) are game-breakingly overpowered and singlehandedly doom the balance of the overall book. Others think that the Twilight/Peace Domain Clerics aren't overpowered at all. Others think that they are overpowered while believing that one/two subclasses alone don't damn a book to being labeled "broken". Some think that the Twilight Domain is combining too many subclass ideas into one and that the basic concept of the subclass is bad and never should have been published. </p><p></p><p>Some people think that the magic items and feats in the book are more powerful than they should have been and significantly boost the power of PCs in ways that previous magic items generally didn't do. Others think the feats are on par with many PHB feats. Some think that the balance of magic items doesn't matter because it isn't baked into the underlying math of the game anyways so they can't break your game unless you were already "breaking" it. </p><p></p><p>Lots of people are debating whether or not wanting a higher number in your main ability score because of the race you chose makes you a powergamer/optimizer, where that threshold between lies, and whether or not any of this matters. </p><p></p><p>That's about it, from what I've read. There might be a few smaller tangents throughout the thread, but these seem to be the main ones.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 8609542, member: 7023887"] Some people think that the book has too much powercreep. Some people think that (outside of a few outliers) the book only gave "powercreep" to the classes/subclasses that needed it (Monks, Rangers, Sorcerers). Some people think that Tasha's changes to racial ASIs are terrible and will destroy D&D's races and think that the only people that like them are munchkins/optimizers/powergamers. Some people like Tasha's changes to racial ASIs and have been using them in their games. Others don't personally like them but are okay with them existing. Some people think that Twilight Clerics (and possibly Peace Domain) are game-breakingly overpowered and singlehandedly doom the balance of the overall book. Others think that the Twilight/Peace Domain Clerics aren't overpowered at all. Others think that they are overpowered while believing that one/two subclasses alone don't damn a book to being labeled "broken". Some think that the Twilight Domain is combining too many subclass ideas into one and that the basic concept of the subclass is bad and never should have been published. Some people think that the magic items and feats in the book are more powerful than they should have been and significantly boost the power of PCs in ways that previous magic items generally didn't do. Others think the feats are on par with many PHB feats. Some think that the balance of magic items doesn't matter because it isn't baked into the underlying math of the game anyways so they can't break your game unless you were already "breaking" it. Lots of people are debating whether or not wanting a higher number in your main ability score because of the race you chose makes you a powergamer/optimizer, where that threshold between lies, and whether or not any of this matters. That's about it, from what I've read. There might be a few smaller tangents throughout the thread, but these seem to be the main ones. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Tasha's Broken?
Top