Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 8998785" data-attributes="member: 7034611">we are discussing whether it is a new edition, not whether according to your definition it is. I am fine with you giving us yours, that does not make it the one we need to accept. That is what I was pointing outbecause the changes are small enough to not warrant an edition change. We had errata which according to your definition would have been new editions. So do you expect us to not just ask 'what version are you playing' but e.g. 'which errata of 4e are you using'. If you want to do that, go right ahead, but you left the commonly accepted understanding of edition (as vague as it already is) behindIf I can play the classes alongside each other and can run the adventures with no more adjustment than they would have needed anyway, then the two are compatible and whether you want to call it a new edition or not is largely meaningless / marketing / agenda.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mamba, post: 8998785, member: 7034611"] we are discussing whether it is a new edition, not whether according to your definition it is. I am fine with you giving us yours, that does not make it the one we need to accept. That is what I was pointing out because the changes are small enough to not warrant an edition change. We had errata which according to your definition would have been new editions. So do you expect us to not just ask 'what version are you playing' but e.g. 'which errata of 4e are you using'. If you want to do that, go right ahead, but you left the commonly accepted understanding of edition (as vague as it already is) behind If I can play the classes alongside each other and can run the adventures with no more adjustment than they would have needed anyway, then the two are compatible and whether you want to call it a new edition or not is largely meaningless / marketing / agenda. [/QUOTE]

Verification