Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the Bard broken?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Primitive Screwhead" data-source="post: 2809309" data-attributes="member: 20805"><p>No, thats the age old argument of "Its imposssible to create a socially skilled class that works in virtually every game because every player/DM combination will treat it differently."</p><p></p><p>You want the Bard to "kick @$$ outside of using Bluff, Diplomacy, or Intimidate."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup, compare the Bard fighting against how well the Fighter does his thing.. he sucks.</p><p>Compare the Bard against the Wizard at spell casting.. he sucks.</p><p>Bard vs Cleric at buffing.. sucks</p><p>Bard vs Rogue {who spent skill points that way} at Diplomancy.. sucks</p><p></p><p>Correct me if I am reading this wrong, but you want a Bard who can handle himself in combat close to the same as a Fighter, has support role type abilitys on par with the Cleric, has skillz in keeping with the Rogue, <em>and</em> fits the poor man's Mage with spell progression?</p><p></p><p>What is the Bard's thing? being able to fill the gap, doing at least enough to get by at fighting, casting, buffing, and is naturally talented at diplomancy. <u>PARTY SUPPORT</u></p><p></p><p>The only way to prove you wrong, as I noted in the post you quoted above, is to play alongside you at a DM's table who caters to the fact that a Bard is in play. Then you might see how the Bard can be a powerful force within the party... or maybe you might not as you are having too much fun hitting more often, avoiding some nasty combats, and having an additional caster backing your play, and the virtually everpresent morale bonuses <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I dropped from that thread back last month... which is about the same time the last "irrational idea of bard adequacy" was mentioned... not sure why you are posting this thread now....Christmas day debate maybe <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> </p><p></p><p>Checking back over the thread.. Seems you went with D8 HD, 3/4 BAB progression, some additional Bardic Songs and a plethora of feats.</p><p> That puts the Bard about even with the Cleric.. of whom I have heard once or twice is the most 'broken' of the core classes.</p><p> Add in the normal skill class list and a capable player.. hehehe.. I have gotten DM's frustrated with using the Core bardic abilities. I would have a field day with this! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Primitive Screwhead, post: 2809309, member: 20805"] No, thats the age old argument of "Its imposssible to create a socially skilled class that works in virtually every game because every player/DM combination will treat it differently." You want the Bard to "kick @$$ outside of using Bluff, Diplomacy, or Intimidate." Yup, compare the Bard fighting against how well the Fighter does his thing.. he sucks. Compare the Bard against the Wizard at spell casting.. he sucks. Bard vs Cleric at buffing.. sucks Bard vs Rogue {who spent skill points that way} at Diplomancy.. sucks Correct me if I am reading this wrong, but you want a Bard who can handle himself in combat close to the same as a Fighter, has support role type abilitys on par with the Cleric, has skillz in keeping with the Rogue, [i]and[/i] fits the poor man's Mage with spell progression? What is the Bard's thing? being able to fill the gap, doing at least enough to get by at fighting, casting, buffing, and is naturally talented at diplomancy. [U]PARTY SUPPORT[/U] The only way to prove you wrong, as I noted in the post you quoted above, is to play alongside you at a DM's table who caters to the fact that a Bard is in play. Then you might see how the Bard can be a powerful force within the party... or maybe you might not as you are having too much fun hitting more often, avoiding some nasty combats, and having an additional caster backing your play, and the virtually everpresent morale bonuses :) I dropped from that thread back last month... which is about the same time the last "irrational idea of bard adequacy" was mentioned... not sure why you are posting this thread now....Christmas day debate maybe :p Checking back over the thread.. Seems you went with D8 HD, 3/4 BAB progression, some additional Bardic Songs and a plethora of feats. That puts the Bard about even with the Cleric.. of whom I have heard once or twice is the most 'broken' of the core classes. Add in the normal skill class list and a capable player.. hehehe.. I have gotten DM's frustrated with using the Core bardic abilities. I would have a field day with this! :uhoh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the Bard broken?
Top