Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the Burning Wheel "how to play" advice useful for D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6096856" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>In the <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?334823-quot-A-World-Worth-Saving-quot-Chris-Perkins-on-NPCs-and-GMing-style" target="_blank">"World Worth Saving"</a> thread, the topic of player and GM responsibilities came up - who should be responsible for what, if the game is going to be fun for all involved?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I mentioned that the Burning Wheel rulebook tackles this head on, and [MENTION=6688858]Libramarian[/MENTION] thought it might be interesting. So here goes (from Burning Wheel revised, pp 265-69):</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><u>Concept, Concept, Concept</u></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">When setting up a Burning Wheel game, the GM and the players come to an agreement about what this story/scenario is going to be all about. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Get this game concept out in the open right off. Sometimes, players will just have a concept for a character he wants to play. . . Pay attention to them. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Once the concept for the game is determined, pick and choose elements from the overall game that are appropriate . . . Toss out any skills, weapons, spells, etc that are inappropriate to your concept. Save them for another game. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Once the concept is agreed upon, the GM's job is to set the lifepath limits and overall power level of the player characters . . . If the concept calls for twinked out munchkin power, then it is the GM's job to set the upper and <em>lower</em> limits of player characters. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">The GM should set the time of the Resources Cycle. . . Setting this cycle most definitely influences the time patterns of the story to be. . . Setting the cycle at a year means characters are going to need a lot of time to have their goals and desires met [because much game time will have to pass to earn money]. There'll be a lot of "season pass" narration. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">If there are Faithful characters [clerics and paladins, in D&D terms] in the group, the GM and those players must decide upon the idiom of their faiths, whether it affects all creatures or just the believers, and any religious strictures placed on the characters. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><u>Tying in Relationships</u></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">GM's: Don't let players buy useless relationships that won't have a bearing on the game. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">With his view of the big picture, the Gm can and should advise players aboiut which relationships are useful and which aren't. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><u>Tying in Beliefs, Instincts and Traits</u></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">If the game is about taking revenge on the wizards who tortured and scarred you, characters better damn well have Beliefs and Instincts that scream anger, hatred and vengeance (or even forgivenss, for extra drama). . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Focus those Beliefs. Charge them. Prime them. Set them to blow. Make your character's life hard. Make it complex, entangled and difficult. Sure you could sit outside the story, be safe and watch, but what the hell fun is that? This is your game. Own it, live it, bleed it.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Instinct should be set to get you in all kinds of trouble. . . If a GM is creating situations whre the Instinct alarm bells aren't going off, he's not doing his job.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Lastly, there's traits. With traits, a player is paying points to say, "my character is <em>this</em>." The other players and the GM better damn wel include scenes and situations where those traits are prominent. . . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><u>Role of the GM</u></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* To make sure the mechanics of the game run smoothly, make sense and gel with the story/actual play at hand.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* To get across <em>my</em> point/vision/idea (also known as the theme of the game).</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* To challenge and engage the players.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* And to make sure that, whether the game is humorous or dramatic, everyone is involved and enjoys themselves.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">In Burning Wheel, it is the GM's job to interpret all the various intents of the players' actions and mesh them into a cohesive whole that fits within the context of the game. He's got to make sure that all the player wackiness abides by the rules. When it doesn't, he must guide wayward players gently back into the fold. Often this requires negotiating an action or intent until both player and GM are satisfied that if fits both within the concept and mood of the game.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Also, the GM is in a unique position. He can see the big picture - what the players are doing, as well as what the opposition is up to and plans to do. . . More than any other player, the GM controls the flow and pacing of the game. He has the power to begin and end scenes, to present challenges and instigate conflicts. It's a heady responsibility but utterly worthwhile.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Most important, the GM is responsible for introducing complications to the story and consequences for the players' choices. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><u>Role of the Players</u></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Finally, there is the sacred and most holy role of the players. In Burning Wheel games, players have a number of duties:</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* Prime among them is the responsibility to offer hooks to their GM and the other players in the form of Beliefs, Instincts and Traits.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* Use the lifepaths to build skeletons of your characters' background, but don't fill in all the details. Let the character develop as play advances - certainly don't write a history in which all the adventure has already happened.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* Players in Burning Wheel must use their characters to drive the story forward - to resolve conflicts and create new ones. Players are <em>supposed</em> to push and risk their characters, so the grow and change in unforeseen ways.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* Use the mechanics! Players are <em>expected </em>to call for a Duel of Wits . . . or to demand the Rnage and Cover rules in a shooting match with a Dark Elf assassin. Don't wait for the GM to invoke a rule - invoke the damn thing yourself and get the story moving!</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">* Participate. . . It doesn't matter if you "win", so long as the story spins in a new and interesting direction. If the story doesn't interest you, <em>it's your job to create interesting situations and involve yourself</em>. If a player's desires and priorities are disruptive for the group as a whole, then it's that player's job to excuse himself from the game and find another group.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Above all, have fun. . . Listen to the other players, riff off them; take their leads and run with them. . .</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Don't forget to call your GM. Start ranting like a mad imp! Or if you are the GM (like me) hopefully you're frothing at the mouth right now (like I am [with a mad imp icon in the margin], bellowing "Hell yeah!"</p><p></p><p>Opinions/responses?</p><p></p><p>I think that's a pretty clear description of what participants' jobs are. It's also an allocation of responsibilities that I like.</p><p></p><p>Because I'm GMing 4e rather than BW, the systems for sending signals and hooks are a bit different - rather than Beliefs, Instincts and Traits, for instance, it's class, role, race, paragon path etc, plus more informal flags the players run up. And I think overall my game is probably less intense than the sort of game Luke Crane is pushing for in his rulebook. But the emphasis on collective responsibility to push the game forward, on using the mechanics to drive the story, on theme, situation and character rather than setting - all that works pretty well for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6096856, member: 42582"] In the [url=http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?334823-quot-A-World-Worth-Saving-quot-Chris-Perkins-on-NPCs-and-GMing-style]"World Worth Saving"[/url] thread, the topic of player and GM responsibilities came up - who should be responsible for what, if the game is going to be fun for all involved? Anyway, I mentioned that the Burning Wheel rulebook tackles this head on, and [MENTION=6688858]Libramarian[/MENTION] thought it might be interesting. So here goes (from Burning Wheel revised, pp 265-69): [indent][U]Concept, Concept, Concept[/U] When setting up a Burning Wheel game, the GM and the players come to an agreement about what this story/scenario is going to be all about. . . Get this game concept out in the open right off. Sometimes, players will just have a concept for a character he wants to play. . . Pay attention to them. . . Once the concept for the game is determined, pick and choose elements from the overall game that are appropriate . . . Toss out any skills, weapons, spells, etc that are inappropriate to your concept. Save them for another game. . . Once the concept is agreed upon, the GM's job is to set the lifepath limits and overall power level of the player characters . . . If the concept calls for twinked out munchkin power, then it is the GM's job to set the upper and [I]lower[/I] limits of player characters. . . The GM should set the time of the Resources Cycle. . . Setting this cycle most definitely influences the time patterns of the story to be. . . Setting the cycle at a year means characters are going to need a lot of time to have their goals and desires met [because much game time will have to pass to earn money]. There'll be a lot of "season pass" narration. . . If there are Faithful characters [clerics and paladins, in D&D terms] in the group, the GM and those players must decide upon the idiom of their faiths, whether it affects all creatures or just the believers, and any religious strictures placed on the characters. . . [U]Tying in Relationships[/U] GM's: Don't let players buy useless relationships that won't have a bearing on the game. . . With his view of the big picture, the Gm can and should advise players aboiut which relationships are useful and which aren't. . . [U]Tying in Beliefs, Instincts and Traits[/U] If the game is about taking revenge on the wizards who tortured and scarred you, characters better damn well have Beliefs and Instincts that scream anger, hatred and vengeance (or even forgivenss, for extra drama). . . Focus those Beliefs. Charge them. Prime them. Set them to blow. Make your character's life hard. Make it complex, entangled and difficult. Sure you could sit outside the story, be safe and watch, but what the hell fun is that? This is your game. Own it, live it, bleed it. Instinct should be set to get you in all kinds of trouble. . . If a GM is creating situations whre the Instinct alarm bells aren't going off, he's not doing his job. Lastly, there's traits. With traits, a player is paying points to say, "my character is [I]this[/I]." The other players and the GM better damn wel include scenes and situations where those traits are prominent. . . . [U]Role of the GM[/U] . . . * To make sure the mechanics of the game run smoothly, make sense and gel with the story/actual play at hand. * To get across [I]my[/I] point/vision/idea (also known as the theme of the game). * To challenge and engage the players. * And to make sure that, whether the game is humorous or dramatic, everyone is involved and enjoys themselves. In Burning Wheel, it is the GM's job to interpret all the various intents of the players' actions and mesh them into a cohesive whole that fits within the context of the game. He's got to make sure that all the player wackiness abides by the rules. When it doesn't, he must guide wayward players gently back into the fold. Often this requires negotiating an action or intent until both player and GM are satisfied that if fits both within the concept and mood of the game. Also, the GM is in a unique position. He can see the big picture - what the players are doing, as well as what the opposition is up to and plans to do. . . More than any other player, the GM controls the flow and pacing of the game. He has the power to begin and end scenes, to present challenges and instigate conflicts. It's a heady responsibility but utterly worthwhile. Most important, the GM is responsible for introducing complications to the story and consequences for the players' choices. . . [U]Role of the Players[/U] Finally, there is the sacred and most holy role of the players. In Burning Wheel games, players have a number of duties: * Prime among them is the responsibility to offer hooks to their GM and the other players in the form of Beliefs, Instincts and Traits. * Use the lifepaths to build skeletons of your characters' background, but don't fill in all the details. Let the character develop as play advances - certainly don't write a history in which all the adventure has already happened. * Players in Burning Wheel must use their characters to drive the story forward - to resolve conflicts and create new ones. Players are [I]supposed[/I] to push and risk their characters, so the grow and change in unforeseen ways. * Use the mechanics! Players are [I]expected [/I]to call for a Duel of Wits . . . or to demand the Rnage and Cover rules in a shooting match with a Dark Elf assassin. Don't wait for the GM to invoke a rule - invoke the damn thing yourself and get the story moving! * Participate. . . It doesn't matter if you "win", so long as the story spins in a new and interesting direction. If the story doesn't interest you, [I]it's your job to create interesting situations and involve yourself[/I]. If a player's desires and priorities are disruptive for the group as a whole, then it's that player's job to excuse himself from the game and find another group. Above all, have fun. . . Listen to the other players, riff off them; take their leads and run with them. . . Don't forget to call your GM. Start ranting like a mad imp! Or if you are the GM (like me) hopefully you're frothing at the mouth right now (like I am [with a mad imp icon in the margin], bellowing "Hell yeah!"[/indent] Opinions/responses? I think that's a pretty clear description of what participants' jobs are. It's also an allocation of responsibilities that I like. Because I'm GMing 4e rather than BW, the systems for sending signals and hooks are a bit different - rather than Beliefs, Instincts and Traits, for instance, it's class, role, race, paragon path etc, plus more informal flags the players run up. And I think overall my game is probably less intense than the sort of game Luke Crane is pushing for in his rulebook. But the emphasis on collective responsibility to push the game forward, on using the mechanics to drive the story, on theme, situation and character rather than setting - all that works pretty well for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the Burning Wheel "how to play" advice useful for D&D?
Top