Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the D&D brand name really that important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M.L. Martin" data-source="post: 5781717" data-attributes="member: 4086"><p>The brand itself? It can be handed over to the OSR or 3.5E loyalists for all I care. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>  The things I <em>do</em> care about enough to be interested are:</p><p>  1. There's a lot of interesting creative material and lore developed for D&D, and a lot of it can only be leveraged by TSR/WotC/the rights holder unless they decide to license it. </p><p>  2. WotC has the most resources and some of the best people in the industry, so if they go in a direction I find appealing, they're likely to do it quite well, such as a lot of 4E. </p><p></p><p>  I really like what I'm hearing about D&DN--I think I proposed the basic concept a couple of years ago <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  (EDIT: Indeed I did--see <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/258381-hypathetical-5e-you-forked-thread-academic-studies-recent-edition-wars-3.html#post4845989" target="_blank">this post.)</a>--and hope they pull it off. I'm even hoping that they release enough playtest material so that, if the experiment fails and they decide to go 3.5+, 1E Redux, or something similar, I'll be able to scavenge the more modular form of the system. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> But beyond a sense of 'wish they'd produce something I was more interested in' and perhaps wasted opportunities, I'm not likely to get too upset.</p><p></p><p>  But then, I'm a strange gamer--I moved away from AD&D about a year after I started, and only Ravenloft kept me interested through much of the 2E period, and even for parts of 3E. For me, D&D is a means to an end, not an end in itself. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M.L. Martin, post: 5781717, member: 4086"] The brand itself? It can be handed over to the OSR or 3.5E loyalists for all I care. :) The things I [i]do[/i] care about enough to be interested are: 1. There's a lot of interesting creative material and lore developed for D&D, and a lot of it can only be leveraged by TSR/WotC/the rights holder unless they decide to license it. 2. WotC has the most resources and some of the best people in the industry, so if they go in a direction I find appealing, they're likely to do it quite well, such as a lot of 4E. I really like what I'm hearing about D&DN--I think I proposed the basic concept a couple of years ago :) (EDIT: Indeed I did--see [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/258381-hypathetical-5e-you-forked-thread-academic-studies-recent-edition-wars-3.html#post4845989"]this post.)[/URL]--and hope they pull it off. I'm even hoping that they release enough playtest material so that, if the experiment fails and they decide to go 3.5+, 1E Redux, or something similar, I'll be able to scavenge the more modular form of the system. :) But beyond a sense of 'wish they'd produce something I was more interested in' and perhaps wasted opportunities, I'm not likely to get too upset. But then, I'm a strange gamer--I moved away from AD&D about a year after I started, and only Ravenloft kept me interested through much of the 2E period, and even for parts of 3E. For me, D&D is a means to an end, not an end in itself. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the D&D brand name really that important?
Top