Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the DM always right?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fba827" data-source="post: 4895419" data-attributes="member: 807"><p>Here is my guideline that I tell people when it comes to rules</p><p></p><p>The order of authority is roughly ...</p><p>(from least authority to most authority)</p><p>1.Character Builder</p><p>2.Books</p><p>3.Customer Service/Faq/Clarifications</p><p>4.Errata</p><p>5.Your DM's decision</p><p></p><p>First I would recommend at least (honestly) listening - does he have a valid point (he may have a valid point even if just one out of a hundred times in there).</p><p></p><p>Then, in response to something you don't necessarily agree with or is too complex to look at that moment, respond with something like "Possibly. But for the sake of keeping things moving, we'll play it like this for now and then I'll look at it later on how to do it in case it comes up again ..."</p><p></p><p>After that, I'd suggest rather than making it about "who is right and who is wrong" in interpreting the rule, you instead state it as "that <em>may</em> be the case, but for this campaign we're doing it like this ..." BUT , be prepared at that point to have responses about why do it one way over the other. It can be vague stuff like "it will work better for stuff planned for this game." or "it works simpler" etc.</p><p></p><p>If all else fails, you can invoke PHB p8 "DM's role" is also listed as referee when "the rules/situation is unclear then the DM's job is to adjudicate what would happen." And, in this case the situation must not clear if you're having a conversation about it. Warning, using this tactic is a make-or-break tactic. It will either quiet the rules lawyer down (because you used text to support your statement) or it will fire him up (because you used text to support your statement so he must go back and find more text to support his).</p><p></p><p></p><p>If it gets really really bad, consider just telling him (in private ) that it is starting to get a little distracting for everyone when he's questioning everything all the time. So could he be a bit more particular about which topics he chooses to question... etc (again, this could go in either extreme direction depending on the person himself).</p><p></p><p>If it just gets worse then you'll have to consider asking him to DM the next campaign or to simply not come back to the game.</p><p></p><p>Disclaimer: just my ramble based on the information presented here. obviously, there are aspects of the social dynamic and personalities that i don't know about. So to it for what it's worth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fba827, post: 4895419, member: 807"] Here is my guideline that I tell people when it comes to rules The order of authority is roughly ... (from least authority to most authority) 1.Character Builder 2.Books 3.Customer Service/Faq/Clarifications 4.Errata 5.Your DM's decision First I would recommend at least (honestly) listening - does he have a valid point (he may have a valid point even if just one out of a hundred times in there). Then, in response to something you don't necessarily agree with or is too complex to look at that moment, respond with something like "Possibly. But for the sake of keeping things moving, we'll play it like this for now and then I'll look at it later on how to do it in case it comes up again ..." After that, I'd suggest rather than making it about "who is right and who is wrong" in interpreting the rule, you instead state it as "that [i]may[/i] be the case, but for this campaign we're doing it like this ..." BUT , be prepared at that point to have responses about why do it one way over the other. It can be vague stuff like "it will work better for stuff planned for this game." or "it works simpler" etc. If all else fails, you can invoke PHB p8 "DM's role" is also listed as referee when "the rules/situation is unclear then the DM's job is to adjudicate what would happen." And, in this case the situation must not clear if you're having a conversation about it. Warning, using this tactic is a make-or-break tactic. It will either quiet the rules lawyer down (because you used text to support your statement) or it will fire him up (because you used text to support your statement so he must go back and find more text to support his). If it gets really really bad, consider just telling him (in private ) that it is starting to get a little distracting for everyone when he's questioning everything all the time. So could he be a bit more particular about which topics he chooses to question... etc (again, this could go in either extreme direction depending on the person himself). If it just gets worse then you'll have to consider asking him to DM the next campaign or to simply not come back to the game. Disclaimer: just my ramble based on the information presented here. obviously, there are aspects of the social dynamic and personalities that i don't know about. So to it for what it's worth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the DM always right?
Top