Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the math off?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kaomera" data-source="post: 4998428" data-attributes="member: 38357"><p>Personally I do not see adding feats as the same as assuming that all characters will take them. These feats suggest more to me that WotC saw some potential merit in complaints about The Math and wanted to offer something for those players / DMs who thought it needed fixing. IMO it's easier for players who don't see a problem with the math to ignore the feats than it is for those who do to take them if they weren't printed... But that does run afoul of pretty much any assumption of reasonable levels of optimization.</p><p></p><p>Having said that I do see the problems that Nifft, keterys, and others have with the feats as-is, and I wish that there had been a sidebar included, explaining the presence of these feats and offering either banning them or making them bonus feats as suggestions. Alternately something like this could be an article on DDI, but I think if some significant number of players are going to have an issue with them it's much better to put that info in print. Overall, however, I'd like to see a lot more "behind the scenes" info on the design process, but I'm not sure if enough of WotC's customer base do to make this feasible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kaomera, post: 4998428, member: 38357"] Personally I do not see adding feats as the same as assuming that all characters will take them. These feats suggest more to me that WotC saw some potential merit in complaints about The Math and wanted to offer something for those players / DMs who thought it needed fixing. IMO it's easier for players who don't see a problem with the math to ignore the feats than it is for those who do to take them if they weren't printed... But that does run afoul of pretty much any assumption of reasonable levels of optimization. Having said that I do see the problems that Nifft, keterys, and others have with the feats as-is, and I wish that there had been a sidebar included, explaining the presence of these feats and offering either banning them or making them bonus feats as suggestions. Alternately something like this could be an article on DDI, but I think if some significant number of players are going to have an issue with them it's much better to put that info in print. Overall, however, I'd like to see a lot more "behind the scenes" info on the design process, but I'm not sure if enough of WotC's customer base do to make this feasible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the math off?
Top