Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the math off?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kenmarable" data-source="post: 4998728" data-attributes="member: 40359"><p>I still don't see why introducing Expertise feats automatically leads to handing "everyone a +3 to attack (but also a -1 Feat penalty to feat choices)." Perhaps they decided the cost of a feat was worth an eventual +3 to attack.*</p><p></p><p>Why are to-hit numbers so utterly pivotal that they need to be maximized at all costs? Yes, every class and most every action involves hitting, but if I hit 5-15% less frequently but each of my hits deal more damage, or I get more attacks, or I get options to help bypass immunities/resistances, or I improve my defenses/healing so that I survive longer, etc. how is that 5-15% chance of hitting so much better than any of those other options, which, perhaps not as directly, also improve the PC's ability to kill monsters? </p><p></p><p>Heck, if you want to get technical, something as basic as Improved Initiative in many battles can give you an entire extra ROUND right at 1st level and for all 30 levels! What's a gradual 5-15% better to-hit when I can get extra move & standard actions for ALL 30 levels of my PC's career?</p><p></p><p>Not to mention all of the feats that give PCs more options to choose from including additional powers and abilities that can make it more likely to have the right tool for the job which can easily outweigh a 5-15% improvement to the attack roll, or improve skills (how much does that 5-15% matter when you don't notice that acid pit trap or when you are completely bypassing a combat through a skill challenge?), or simply make your PC more interesting.</p><p></p><p>To me, at least, is just looks like they decided you could pay the cost of a feat, and get a 5-15% better chance to hit. Simple and straightforward, no back-door errata. Of course you are reducing your other customization options by 5.5% (17 more feats rather than 18) and all of the options those 1300+ feats offer your PC - many of which can help you kill monsters just as well as hitting a little more frequently. </p><p></p><p>Pay a feat then hit more often - but your hits aren't any more powerful, your skills aren't any better, you don't gain any additional powers, etc. etc. What am I missing that makes this a fix that is necessary to all PCs and not just another bonus at the cost of a feat?</p><p></p><p></p><p>* Oh and don't forget, that bonus is only for a particular implement or weapon group - so the PC is out of luck if:</p><p>a) You find a better weapon or implement before you get a chance to retrain the feat, or</p><p>b) have magic weapons or implements that are good for different situations, or</p><p>c) have a class that benefits from both implements and weapons that aren't the same.</p><p>From the discussions, it is portrayed both as a 15% better chance to hit (which is true only in the final 1/6th of your career - it's only a 5% better chance for half of your PC's life) and as an automatic bonus on all powers, which is often but not necessarily always the case.</p><p></p><p>(Wow, that looks rantish. Sorry, I'm just honestly thinking I must be missing something when so many reasonable and knowledgeable posters think the Expertise feats are necessary for PCs or else they are "worse at their jobs". It literally makes zero sense to me.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kenmarable, post: 4998728, member: 40359"] I still don't see why introducing Expertise feats automatically leads to handing "everyone a +3 to attack (but also a -1 Feat penalty to feat choices)." Perhaps they decided the cost of a feat was worth an eventual +3 to attack.* Why are to-hit numbers so utterly pivotal that they need to be maximized at all costs? Yes, every class and most every action involves hitting, but if I hit 5-15% less frequently but each of my hits deal more damage, or I get more attacks, or I get options to help bypass immunities/resistances, or I improve my defenses/healing so that I survive longer, etc. how is that 5-15% chance of hitting so much better than any of those other options, which, perhaps not as directly, also improve the PC's ability to kill monsters? Heck, if you want to get technical, something as basic as Improved Initiative in many battles can give you an entire extra ROUND right at 1st level and for all 30 levels! What's a gradual 5-15% better to-hit when I can get extra move & standard actions for ALL 30 levels of my PC's career? Not to mention all of the feats that give PCs more options to choose from including additional powers and abilities that can make it more likely to have the right tool for the job which can easily outweigh a 5-15% improvement to the attack roll, or improve skills (how much does that 5-15% matter when you don't notice that acid pit trap or when you are completely bypassing a combat through a skill challenge?), or simply make your PC more interesting. To me, at least, is just looks like they decided you could pay the cost of a feat, and get a 5-15% better chance to hit. Simple and straightforward, no back-door errata. Of course you are reducing your other customization options by 5.5% (17 more feats rather than 18) and all of the options those 1300+ feats offer your PC - many of which can help you kill monsters just as well as hitting a little more frequently. Pay a feat then hit more often - but your hits aren't any more powerful, your skills aren't any better, you don't gain any additional powers, etc. etc. What am I missing that makes this a fix that is necessary to all PCs and not just another bonus at the cost of a feat? * Oh and don't forget, that bonus is only for a particular implement or weapon group - so the PC is out of luck if: a) You find a better weapon or implement before you get a chance to retrain the feat, or b) have magic weapons or implements that are good for different situations, or c) have a class that benefits from both implements and weapons that aren't the same. From the discussions, it is portrayed both as a 15% better chance to hit (which is true only in the final 1/6th of your career - it's only a 5% better chance for half of your PC's life) and as an automatic bonus on all powers, which is often but not necessarily always the case. (Wow, that looks rantish. Sorry, I'm just honestly thinking I must be missing something when so many reasonable and knowledgeable posters think the Expertise feats are necessary for PCs or else they are "worse at their jobs". It literally makes zero sense to me.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the math off?
Top