Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Theroc" data-source="post: 4999724" data-attributes="member: 83115">Just because I will not tell someone how to play their character doesn't mean I won't inform them of any potential pitfalls in their choices, if I am unsure if they are aware.  Particularly since many of my friends would have lesser system mastery than I, were I to engage in a F2F game, I would let them know of potential issues if the DM was not addressing them.I will not say, "Don't play a Dragonborn", I may say, "As a not, if we ever get to epic levels, you may have trouble hitting things with your breath weapon, due to XYZ Math rant" I will tell them I highly recommend they take X feat as it is mechanically superior and explain a bit about why that is, if they are interested, but in the end I would leave it up to them.  Just because I should not tell them what they 'can' do doesn't mean I'm no longer allowed to give advice.Just because the DM doesn't WANT to adjust that math, doesn't me he should not.  He's allowed his choice, right or wrong.  If I feel he SHOULD, I will suggest/recommend it.  If he does not take the advice, I may be disappointed, but chances are I will still want to play.  I won't pressure Wizards to do anything, because I know my lone voice crying in the wilderness is meaningless, but if I feel my voice may correct the error, then I will for d*** sure make my opinion heard.  I am not certain the math is very off, but the inclusion of a similar scaling of Racial powers to Implement expertise in those racial feats tells me that something is off.  It also would prompt me to encourage a DM allowing such races in their campaigns to look into adjusting racials such as the Dragonborn's to follow that trend, due to how it appears to me.</blockquote>

Verification