Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mephista" data-source="post: 6699743" data-attributes="member: 6786252">The preview is a single page that tells us nothing.&nbsp; No proficencies, no levels, no abilities, and the HD changes with subclass.&nbsp; Everything is in the subclasses, which we don't get to see in the so-called preview.&nbsp; Its worthless.Reviews have been less than forthcoming about any details necessary to make a decision.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?6775639-Saplatt" target="_blank">Saplatt's post on the first page</a> has the largest amount of detail I've seen thus far, and that's saying something with how brief that post is.&nbsp; There are no reviews on how well it interacts with others, how commanding casters works, anything worthwhile.&nbsp; So, no.&nbsp; There is nothing to communicate quality so far.&nbsp; What you suspect, or not, about my and other's spending is irrelevant.&nbsp; Plus I find that comment of &quot;text content&quot; to be rather suspect.&nbsp; Do you mean pay for story aka fluff?&nbsp;&nbsp; Because if you're insulting that, then I have to shake my head at you for being dismissive of story.&nbsp; We have shelves of fiction for a reason - people like story.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mephista, post: 6699743, member: 6786252"] The preview is a single page that tells us nothing. No proficencies, no levels, no abilities, and the HD changes with subclass. Everything is in the subclasses, which we don't get to see in the so-called preview. Its worthless. Reviews have been less than forthcoming about any details necessary to make a decision. [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?6775639-Saplatt"]Saplatt's post on the first page[/URL] has the largest amount of detail I've seen thus far, and that's saying something with how brief that post is. There are no reviews on how well it interacts with others, how commanding casters works, anything worthwhile. So, no. There is nothing to communicate quality so far. What you suspect, or not, about my and other's spending is irrelevant. Plus I find that comment of "text content" to be rather suspect. Do you mean pay for story aka fluff? Because if you're insulting that, then I have to shake my head at you for being dismissive of story. We have shelves of fiction for a reason - people like story. [/QUOTE]

Verification