Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JohnLynch" data-source="post: 6729453" data-attributes="member: 6749563">I saw this thread and figured I should weigh in on this discussion given I've been championing the Noble so much of late. The reason for my proselytizing is due to the fact I'm seeing people say "Warlords simply can't work in 5e ever" or "I really want a Warlord and would love to play one." I've been pointing out the noble for those who want a warlord because to me it does very much fit a lot of the archetypes of the warlord class. For those who say the warlord absolutely cannot work, I feel the noble is a good example of why it can.I wouldn't say the noble class can currently fit every single warlord archetype. However it does fit the popular ones. To fit every single one, it would potentially need more subclasses (not that I have a specific archetype that I feel is lacking. I'm just assuming there are some <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />). As for the design of the class, it's a bit quirky (see a complete lack of armor and weapon proficiencies for the base class) but I think it works well at achieving what it's trying to achieve. There may be some minor support for the Path of the Brave subclass and possibly the Path of the Tactician subclasses. I'll try to remember to pop in once I can confirm whether or not it will be coming.</blockquote>

Verification