Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the Psion class balanced?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IanB" data-source="post: 2727505" data-attributes="member: 1473"><p>Perhaps a minor point, but I think +4 to spell penetration rolls that is on all the time is far preferable to a +8 that I can only use once per fight without spending time trying to get my focus back and that also presents me with an opportunity cost in losing other actions I could take by spending that focus (or passive abilities that only function while focused.)</p><p></p><p>I know my first impression upon seeing the power penetration feats in the XPH was 'blech.' I haven't seen anything in play yet that has caused me to change my mind about it. (Yes, we have multiple games with psions.)</p><p></p><p>Sure, the psion might get +8 on one spell roll one round. If he wants to do it again the next round, he has to have spent a feat on psionic meditation, at a total cost of 3 feats, or 2 feats on psicrystal affinity and psicrystal containment, at a total cost of 4 feats. On top of that using the focus on power penetration precludes using it for DC enhancement or a metapsionic power, again, unless more feats are spent.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, the wizard can cast 2 regular spells and 2 quickened spells in the same time, all of which get +4, and while he's also spent 3 feats to get there, spending a spell slot on quicken spell is much more attractive an option to me than spending a spell slot to shore up a weakness. He also doesn't have the requirement to make a concentration roll to gain his focus back, thereby taking extra attacks of opportunity and being subject to other modifiers to skill checks, etc.</p><p></p><p>I don't see an advantage here, I see a disadvantage, and a pretty strong one at that, except in narrow cases where the SR of a foe is significantly out of whack for the group's level. </p><p></p><p>Feat slots are, in my opinion, the most precious resource a character has. It is the same problem that Psionic Endowment/Greater Psionic Endowment have when stacked next to Spell Focus (although really that one is much worse, since at least with Power Penetration the psion gets double value. Psionic Endowment only has the advantage of not being school-dependent, which is not that much of an advantage.) Passive bonuses are generally stronger in the long run than active ones, unless the active ones are really aggressively designed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IanB, post: 2727505, member: 1473"] Perhaps a minor point, but I think +4 to spell penetration rolls that is on all the time is far preferable to a +8 that I can only use once per fight without spending time trying to get my focus back and that also presents me with an opportunity cost in losing other actions I could take by spending that focus (or passive abilities that only function while focused.) I know my first impression upon seeing the power penetration feats in the XPH was 'blech.' I haven't seen anything in play yet that has caused me to change my mind about it. (Yes, we have multiple games with psions.) Sure, the psion might get +8 on one spell roll one round. If he wants to do it again the next round, he has to have spent a feat on psionic meditation, at a total cost of 3 feats, or 2 feats on psicrystal affinity and psicrystal containment, at a total cost of 4 feats. On top of that using the focus on power penetration precludes using it for DC enhancement or a metapsionic power, again, unless more feats are spent. Meanwhile, the wizard can cast 2 regular spells and 2 quickened spells in the same time, all of which get +4, and while he's also spent 3 feats to get there, spending a spell slot on quicken spell is much more attractive an option to me than spending a spell slot to shore up a weakness. He also doesn't have the requirement to make a concentration roll to gain his focus back, thereby taking extra attacks of opportunity and being subject to other modifiers to skill checks, etc. I don't see an advantage here, I see a disadvantage, and a pretty strong one at that, except in narrow cases where the SR of a foe is significantly out of whack for the group's level. Feat slots are, in my opinion, the most precious resource a character has. It is the same problem that Psionic Endowment/Greater Psionic Endowment have when stacked next to Spell Focus (although really that one is much worse, since at least with Power Penetration the psion gets double value. Psionic Endowment only has the advantage of not being school-dependent, which is not that much of an advantage.) Passive bonuses are generally stronger in the long run than active ones, unless the active ones are really aggressively designed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is the Psion class balanced?
Top