Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the Split a Bad Thing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 5762244" data-attributes="member: 58416"><p>While I agree (and have posted in other threads) that some people do associate D&D with rpgs, I would argue that's not the case as much as it was previously. I imagine my anecdotal evidence isn't worth a hill of beans, but I compare what the atmosphere was like when I first learned D&D 10 or so years ago compared to now and the time in between. I more often hear other rpg names being thrown around now than I had before. D&D is still seen as what I suppose as a flagship, but I feel a broader variety of games are seen and heard more than before. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I think what needs to happen is for the hobby -or at least a fracture of it- to reinvent itself. Embrace the split instead of fighting against it. I do not believe the term 'RPG' is still healthy as a blanket term. It has too much baggage, and I also believe that games have evolved enough to where it can be sometimes difficult to categorize some of them under the same thing. I'd like to see games which label themselves differently; create more of their own identity rather than trying to fit into the broader label. Imagine if with D&D 5th Edition we got the Dungeons & Dragons <em>roleplaying game</em>, but Paizo published the Golarion <em>collaborative storytelling system.</em></p><p></p><p>I only chose to use WoTC and Paizo for ease of reference. </p><p></p><p>What's in a name? I suppose my question is whether the two ways of saying the same thing really say the same thing or if they cause your mind to have different expectations. How would the different label be perceived by someone seeing the product for the first time; someone who hasn't played rpgs?</p><p></p><p></p><p>edit: The funny thing about experiences are how different they can be. In your experience, you've never heard people trash D&D in public. I have. Likewise, your GURPS/D&D conflict is actually the exact opposite of what I went through. Back when I was looking to try games outside of D&D, I remember picking up a GURPS book in the store and having somebody tell me 'you don't want that; it's way too complicated to even be playable.' So, I spent about another hour in the store looking through the shelves of books; eventually coming back to GURPS and narrowing my choices between it and (if I remember correctly) Hero System 5th Edition. For some reason, GURPS seemed to click in my head during a brief look through the core books in a way that Hero didn't. (Not bashing Hero; for some reason, my mind just didn't take in the information as well during a cursory glance.) In spite of more heckling, I bought the core set, and I'm glad I did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 5762244, member: 58416"] While I agree (and have posted in other threads) that some people do associate D&D with rpgs, I would argue that's not the case as much as it was previously. I imagine my anecdotal evidence isn't worth a hill of beans, but I compare what the atmosphere was like when I first learned D&D 10 or so years ago compared to now and the time in between. I more often hear other rpg names being thrown around now than I had before. D&D is still seen as what I suppose as a flagship, but I feel a broader variety of games are seen and heard more than before. Personally, I think what needs to happen is for the hobby -or at least a fracture of it- to reinvent itself. Embrace the split instead of fighting against it. I do not believe the term 'RPG' is still healthy as a blanket term. It has too much baggage, and I also believe that games have evolved enough to where it can be sometimes difficult to categorize some of them under the same thing. I'd like to see games which label themselves differently; create more of their own identity rather than trying to fit into the broader label. Imagine if with D&D 5th Edition we got the Dungeons & Dragons [I]roleplaying game[/I], but Paizo published the Golarion [I]collaborative storytelling system.[/I] I only chose to use WoTC and Paizo for ease of reference. What's in a name? I suppose my question is whether the two ways of saying the same thing really say the same thing or if they cause your mind to have different expectations. How would the different label be perceived by someone seeing the product for the first time; someone who hasn't played rpgs? edit: The funny thing about experiences are how different they can be. In your experience, you've never heard people trash D&D in public. I have. Likewise, your GURPS/D&D conflict is actually the exact opposite of what I went through. Back when I was looking to try games outside of D&D, I remember picking up a GURPS book in the store and having somebody tell me 'you don't want that; it's way too complicated to even be playable.' So, I spent about another hour in the store looking through the shelves of books; eventually coming back to GURPS and narrowing my choices between it and (if I remember correctly) Hero System 5th Edition. For some reason, GURPS seemed to click in my head during a brief look through the core books in a way that Hero didn't. (Not bashing Hero; for some reason, my mind just didn't take in the information as well during a cursory glance.) In spite of more heckling, I bought the core set, and I'm glad I did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the Split a Bad Thing?
Top