Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is the Tarrasque tough enough?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tormyr" data-source="post: 6418552" data-attributes="member: 6776887"><p>I think it is closer to</p><p></p><p>Jump + height + attack reach (MM) 13 + 50 + 15 = 78 for [MENTION=2011]KarinsDad[/MENTION]</p><p>and</p><p>Jump + height + 1/2 height reach (PHB) 13 + 50 + 25 for [MENTION=2525]Mistwell[/MENTION]</p><p></p><p>The Tarrasque artwork shows the Tarrasque getting significantly taller and shorter based on how it stands. If the main picture is 50 feet tall, the upper picture could very well be taller. I believe Mistwell was referencing this and applying what was felt to be a reasonable amount. Whether that would translate into a jump and how much it would affect reach...</p><p>jump + standing upright + upright reach 13 + 70 +35 = 118</p><p>jump + standing upright + normal jump reach 13 + 70 + 25 = 108</p><p></p><p>Part of what drew me to D&D was that you can do just about anything within reason. Want to get across a crowded market square by running across people's heads? Sure! Want to smash through a wall into the next house of a terraced house to get at the thug that is shooting into the crowd below? There's a roll for that!</p><p></p><p>In the case of monsters, I do not see the stat block as restrictive. There are other things that a monster can do. Humanoids can pick up a different weapon and use it. They might not have proficiency with that weapon, but they can still use it. I view the rock attack for the Tarrasque similarly. It is basically picking up a weapon that other similar monsters use, but it does not have proficiency because it is not listed in the stat block.</p><p></p><p>I view the jumping Tarrasque similarly. It can jump 13 feet. It may even be able to raise up and extend its height a bit. If it tried to grab someone, I might give use the 108 number for its reach with disadvantage because it is stretched out so much. While I would use Jump + height + attack reach for an attack using disadvantage if it stood up tall for the extra 20 feet. </p><p></p><p>This strikes me as a "rulings not rules" or "Use the rules. Don't let the rules use you."~Psion type of situation. The stat block is not a restrictive list of what the monster can do. It is a list of what is common, but you can grab other parts of the rules that fit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tormyr, post: 6418552, member: 6776887"] I think it is closer to Jump + height + attack reach (MM) 13 + 50 + 15 = 78 for [MENTION=2011]KarinsDad[/MENTION] and Jump + height + 1/2 height reach (PHB) 13 + 50 + 25 for [MENTION=2525]Mistwell[/MENTION] The Tarrasque artwork shows the Tarrasque getting significantly taller and shorter based on how it stands. If the main picture is 50 feet tall, the upper picture could very well be taller. I believe Mistwell was referencing this and applying what was felt to be a reasonable amount. Whether that would translate into a jump and how much it would affect reach... jump + standing upright + upright reach 13 + 70 +35 = 118 jump + standing upright + normal jump reach 13 + 70 + 25 = 108 Part of what drew me to D&D was that you can do just about anything within reason. Want to get across a crowded market square by running across people's heads? Sure! Want to smash through a wall into the next house of a terraced house to get at the thug that is shooting into the crowd below? There's a roll for that! In the case of monsters, I do not see the stat block as restrictive. There are other things that a monster can do. Humanoids can pick up a different weapon and use it. They might not have proficiency with that weapon, but they can still use it. I view the rock attack for the Tarrasque similarly. It is basically picking up a weapon that other similar monsters use, but it does not have proficiency because it is not listed in the stat block. I view the jumping Tarrasque similarly. It can jump 13 feet. It may even be able to raise up and extend its height a bit. If it tried to grab someone, I might give use the 108 number for its reach with disadvantage because it is stretched out so much. While I would use Jump + height + attack reach for an attack using disadvantage if it stood up tall for the extra 20 feet. This strikes me as a "rulings not rules" or "Use the rules. Don't let the rules use you."~Psion type of situation. The stat block is not a restrictive list of what the monster can do. It is a list of what is common, but you can grab other parts of the rules that fit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is the Tarrasque tough enough?
Top