Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6418687" data-attributes="member: 2525">Here is why I am harping on it.  This is the standard you set forth in this thread earlier when I tried to interpret how multiple rules fit together with each other in a similar manner:Are we clear now? You set a standard that very clearly did not tolerate a lack of a precise rule to back up my assertions.  When I tried to interpret how two rules fit together, you insulted me repeatedly for doing it.  And now it turns out you have been doing the same damn thing this whole time.  And you want me to be forgiving of it, despite having explained when you were insulting me that these things make you less forgiving.There is no rule you're quoting.  You're interpreting two rules and trying to piece them together as best you can based on your experience, which is exactly what I was trying to do.I don't know what part of "don't answer my question with a question" was unclear, but don't answer my question with a question.  What rule are you claiming supports your position? If it's just how you would rule it given there is no rule to cover it, that's fine, but it makes your earlier nasty bashing of me look pretty damn bad.</blockquote>