Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the Unearthed Arcana SRD online?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lonely Tylenol" data-source="post: 1491856" data-attributes="member: 18549"><p>So, what you're saying is, anyone claiming that it's okay to operate within the law shouldn't complain if they're caught if they break the law? Um, okay. I do agree that one should obey the law (with certain exceptions in the case of civil disobedience) and accept the penalty if one breaks the law. I also agree that it's okay to do things that the law permits. I think we can all agree on that, so let's try to stop dressing those statements up as arguments for or against this issue, because it's getting kind of silly.</p><p></p><p>The issue seems to be that on the one hand there are those who think that there's some sort of "gentlemen's agreement" that says that only publishers should be able to get their hands on open content, and/or that those publishers should have to comb through the books themselves to get it, despite what the OGL states (it states the contrary). On the other hand there are those who say that they're entitled to do whatever they're entitled to do with open content, and that by declaring something open content, a publisher is in fact inviting them to do so. Then there's the middle, who say that they have a right to treat open content like open content, but they will leave a polite time delay so that the publisher can make a profit on its work before the open content is distributed.</p><p></p><p>The middle ground looks to be the best. It follows the rules to the letter, giving everyone access to the material they are legally entitled to. It also provides the "gentlemen's" approach, by which the original publisher is given some respect and credit, as well as the chance to make the primary revenue from the OGC.</p><p></p><p>Now then, I think this is probably going to turn out to be a moot argument, because I don't anticipate a free .pdf replacing people's book-coveting behaviour. If you want the book, you'll buy it. If you don't, you won't. But in the second case you might get the .pdf. In the first case you also might, but you'll have the book, too.</p><p></p><p>Also, don't speed. It's dangerous. And you'll get a ticket.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lonely Tylenol, post: 1491856, member: 18549"] So, what you're saying is, anyone claiming that it's okay to operate within the law shouldn't complain if they're caught if they break the law? Um, okay. I do agree that one should obey the law (with certain exceptions in the case of civil disobedience) and accept the penalty if one breaks the law. I also agree that it's okay to do things that the law permits. I think we can all agree on that, so let's try to stop dressing those statements up as arguments for or against this issue, because it's getting kind of silly. The issue seems to be that on the one hand there are those who think that there's some sort of "gentlemen's agreement" that says that only publishers should be able to get their hands on open content, and/or that those publishers should have to comb through the books themselves to get it, despite what the OGL states (it states the contrary). On the other hand there are those who say that they're entitled to do whatever they're entitled to do with open content, and that by declaring something open content, a publisher is in fact inviting them to do so. Then there's the middle, who say that they have a right to treat open content like open content, but they will leave a polite time delay so that the publisher can make a profit on its work before the open content is distributed. The middle ground looks to be the best. It follows the rules to the letter, giving everyone access to the material they are legally entitled to. It also provides the "gentlemen's" approach, by which the original publisher is given some respect and credit, as well as the chance to make the primary revenue from the OGC. Now then, I think this is probably going to turn out to be a moot argument, because I don't anticipate a free .pdf replacing people's book-coveting behaviour. If you want the book, you'll buy it. If you don't, you won't. But in the second case you might get the .pdf. In the first case you also might, but you'll have the book, too. Also, don't speed. It's dangerous. And you'll get a ticket. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is the Unearthed Arcana SRD online?
Top