Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bendris Noulg" data-source="post: 1516223" data-attributes="member: 6398">Only on Romper Room and Mister Roger's Neighborhood.&nbsp;I do understand it.&nbsp; However, bringing up the fact that you choose to do so lends no weight what-so-ever to the topic, so I gotta ask: Are you bringing it up to look morally superior or just as an FYI?&nbsp; Cause we've already trumped the morality issue, and if it's just an FYI, well, a dozen posts saying the same thing goes well beyond making a point.&nbsp;Glad you see my point.&nbsp;The fact that you keep bringing it up is rather annoying in itself, but not as annoying as not understanding what the hell your trying to say in that last sentance.&nbsp;Which project would that be?&nbsp;Wow...&nbsp; So much said in two little sentances.&nbsp;For someone that wants the topic to die, you seem unable to resist continuing it.&nbsp;I am reading all the posts.&nbsp; That's the problem: You keep repeating yourself, and with little to no real reason.&nbsp;Well, I certainly don't know anything about you other than your views (and those being limited to the ones you keep repeating in this thread).&nbsp; However, one thing the license does dictate is that, once made OGC, what happens to the material, when it happens, and how it's done, is irrelevant so long as its within the bounds of the license.&nbsp; I cannot support (and will indeed speak against) anything that allows an individual to go around the license and prevent the re-use of OGC they released under it.&nbsp; To which, &quot;asking&quot; for &quot;permission&quot; which is already given does just that; you might as well ask, &quot;is this material really OGC?&quot; because if the material is OGC, than no one has the right to say &quot;no&quot; to its re-use.&nbsp; Indeed, I would find being told &quot;no&quot; to be disrespectful, both towards me and Open Gaming.&nbsp; As is, I'd rather know people for the excellent work they do instead of knowing what kind of jerks they are.&nbsp;To which, while you see it as something that &quot;should&quot; be done, I see it as something that &quot;should not&quot; be done.&nbsp; And you can definately expect me to repeat such everytime you bring it up.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bendris Noulg, post: 1516223, member: 6398"] Only on [i]Romper Room[/i] and [i]Mister Roger's Neighborhood[/i]. I do understand it. However, bringing up the fact that you choose to do so lends no weight what-so-ever to the topic, so I gotta ask: Are you bringing it up to look morally superior or just as an FYI? Cause we've already trumped the morality issue, and if it's just an FYI, well, a dozen posts saying the same thing goes well beyond making a point. Glad you see my point. The fact that you keep bringing it up is rather annoying in itself, but not as annoying as not understanding what the hell your trying to say in that last sentance. Which project would that be? Wow... So much said in two little sentances. For someone that wants the topic to die, you seem unable to resist continuing it. I am reading all the posts. That's the problem: You keep repeating yourself, and with little to no real reason. Well, I certainly don't know anything about you other than your views (and those being limited to the ones you keep repeating in this thread). However, one thing the license [i]does[/i] dictate is that, once made OGC, what happens to the material, when it happens, and how it's done, is irrelevant so long as its within the bounds of the license. I cannot support (and will indeed speak against) anything that allows an individual to go around the license and prevent the re-use of OGC they released under it. To which, "asking" for "permission" which is already given does just that; you might as well ask, "is this material really OGC?" because if the material [i]is[/i] OGC, than no one has the right to say "no" to its re-use. Indeed, I would find being told "no" to be disrespectful, both towards me and Open Gaming. As is, I'd rather know people for the excellent work they do instead of knowing what kind of jerks they are. To which, while you see it as something that "should" be done, I see it as something that "should not" be done. And you can definately expect me to repeat such everytime you bring it up. [/QUOTE]

Verification