Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is the Warlock the Best Class?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 7830892" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>Actually, the Variant: Familiars sidebar in the MM indicates that NPCs who can cast <em>find familiar</em> might have a familiar, which could be a spirit like from the spell, or a crawling claw, imp, quasit, pseudodragon, sprite, or some other tiny creature. (That's all of the Pact of the Chain options plus crawling claw and "others".)</p><p></p><p>This doesn't say that the NPC uses <em>find familiar</em> in connection with those creatures becoming it's familiar, but the fact that it references them having the spell at all really suggests that the spell has something to do with it.</p><p></p><p>Here's something from AL that might give a better idea of what they were thinking with all of these unclear statements:</p><p></p><p> <a href="https://www.enworld.org/attachments/precedentfamiliar-png.114735/?hash=fbb0435581dbc87d2a0915c12c48cb6f" target="_blank"><img src="https://www.enworld.org/data/attachments/74/74627-5253da12a7684f517ac8e8a29c96b000.jpg" alt="PrecedentFamiliar.PNG" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p>That precedent allows you to cast a <em>find familiar </em>spell on a willing existing creature (rather than summoning a spirit with the spell), and then the creature follows at least some of the rules under the spell--such as being only discorporated when reduced to 0 hp and able to be resummoned by casting the spell again.</p><p></p><p>I think that example should be used to make sense of the information in the MM--because it <em>can</em> make consistent sense of it. So here's how I would run the rule to combine all this material together:</p><p></p><p>As an alternative to its normal usage, you can cast the <em>find familiar</em> spell on any willing tiny creature that the DM approves. At minimum the list should include the specific creatures who have familiar sidebars in the MM, and the additional creature or two mentioned in the Variant: Familiars sidebar. That creature is now bound to you as a familiar, and, other than causing it to change shape into a different familiar, it follows all the familiar rules in the spell, such as being able to be resummoned if reduced to 0 hp, be sent to an extradimensional space, etc. If the creature has a sidebar about using it as a familiar, those additional aspects also apply (those creatures just make especially good familiars).</p><p></p><p>I can't actually think of any reason <em>not</em> to interpret it like that, other than thinking it makes familiars too powerful or something. It makes the game more interesting and allows interesting concepts. And remember the downside that these special familiars have wills of their own and can terminate the bond at any time (I'd assume that should apply to any familiar that isn't just a summoned spirit). And finally, if you don't do something like that you have orphaned rules and precedents sitting there in the MM looking at you funny.</p><p></p><p>The only issue becomes how to keep Pact of the Chain familiars special. It's already pretty cool in that it is a spirit that can switch between those alternative familiar forms. But I would absolutely give it the extra abilities listed for any special familiars in the MM when in those forms. (That's contrary to Sage Advice, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make to make sense of the rules. And Sage Advice advises you to ignore Sage Advice if it doesn't work for you.) Personally, I'd also extend it to say it can take any other forms from the MM than that DM would allow to become familiars. That's all in the realm of interpretation.</p><p></p><p>As an outright house rule that contradicts the books, I'd say that all familiars (including the summoned spirits in animal forms right from the spell description) can attack normally. There is no good reason--it's not like their attacks are significant. For the Pact of the Chain, I'd say that when warlock gives them an attack, that attack (which uses their reaction according to the most up to date rules), is <em>in addition</em> to their normal actions or attacks.</p><p></p><p>And that is how it's done.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 7830892, member: 6677017"] Actually, the Variant: Familiars sidebar in the MM indicates that NPCs who can cast [I]find familiar[/I] might have a familiar, which could be a spirit like from the spell, or a crawling claw, imp, quasit, pseudodragon, sprite, or some other tiny creature. (That's all of the Pact of the Chain options plus crawling claw and "others".) This doesn't say that the NPC uses [I]find familiar[/I] in connection with those creatures becoming it's familiar, but the fact that it references them having the spell at all really suggests that the spell has something to do with it. Here's something from AL that might give a better idea of what they were thinking with all of these unclear statements: [URL='https://www.enworld.org/attachments/precedentfamiliar-png.114735/?hash=fbb0435581dbc87d2a0915c12c48cb6f'][IMG alt="PrecedentFamiliar.PNG"]https://www.enworld.org/data/attachments/74/74627-5253da12a7684f517ac8e8a29c96b000.jpg[/IMG][/URL] That precedent allows you to cast a [I]find familiar [/I]spell on a willing existing creature (rather than summoning a spirit with the spell), and then the creature follows at least some of the rules under the spell--such as being only discorporated when reduced to 0 hp and able to be resummoned by casting the spell again. I think that example should be used to make sense of the information in the MM--because it [I]can[/I] make consistent sense of it. So here's how I would run the rule to combine all this material together: As an alternative to its normal usage, you can cast the [I]find familiar[/I] spell on any willing tiny creature that the DM approves. At minimum the list should include the specific creatures who have familiar sidebars in the MM, and the additional creature or two mentioned in the Variant: Familiars sidebar. That creature is now bound to you as a familiar, and, other than causing it to change shape into a different familiar, it follows all the familiar rules in the spell, such as being able to be resummoned if reduced to 0 hp, be sent to an extradimensional space, etc. If the creature has a sidebar about using it as a familiar, those additional aspects also apply (those creatures just make especially good familiars). I can't actually think of any reason [I]not[/I] to interpret it like that, other than thinking it makes familiars too powerful or something. It makes the game more interesting and allows interesting concepts. And remember the downside that these special familiars have wills of their own and can terminate the bond at any time (I'd assume that should apply to any familiar that isn't just a summoned spirit). And finally, if you don't do something like that you have orphaned rules and precedents sitting there in the MM looking at you funny. The only issue becomes how to keep Pact of the Chain familiars special. It's already pretty cool in that it is a spirit that can switch between those alternative familiar forms. But I would absolutely give it the extra abilities listed for any special familiars in the MM when in those forms. (That's contrary to Sage Advice, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make to make sense of the rules. And Sage Advice advises you to ignore Sage Advice if it doesn't work for you.) Personally, I'd also extend it to say it can take any other forms from the MM than that DM would allow to become familiars. That's all in the realm of interpretation. As an outright house rule that contradicts the books, I'd say that all familiars (including the summoned spirits in animal forms right from the spell description) can attack normally. There is no good reason--it's not like their attacks are significant. For the Pact of the Chain, I'd say that when warlock gives them an attack, that attack (which uses their reaction according to the most up to date rules), is [I]in addition[/I] to their normal actions or attacks. And that is how it's done. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is the Warlock the Best Class?
Top