Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is there a better way to handle Exotic Weapon Proficiency?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Friend of the Dork" data-source="post: 5736119" data-attributes="member: 91954"><p><strong>Good idea</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except, Martial Weapon Proficiency feat only gives you ONE proficiency, not all. And double-axes and swords should not be the same because of axe and sword are the same, but rather it's use as a double-weapon. </p><p></p><p>I think I like the Weapon Groups as well, it could be based on the Figher ones: </p><p>Exotic Axes, Heavy Blades, Light Blades, Bows, Close, Crossbows, Double etc. </p><p></p><p>So a character taking Exotic Heavy Blade proficiency could use a Bastard Sword, Elven Curve Blade, Katana, No-Dachi. I'm not sure if we should allow overlap, like having double-bladed sword in both the Heavy Blade AND the Double group. But I'm inclined to allow it. A feat is pretty valuable, and being able to use several weapons is not that advantagous in this game as the system rewards specialization (magic item, feats, etc). </p><p></p><p>I really like the suggestion... this will probably be in a future campaign at least. I'd allow the same for Martial Weapon and Simple Weapon feats, but ONLY the feats. Rogues will not suddenly become proficent with longswords because they can use Rapiers. But if they take Martial Heavy Blade prof. feat, I think they should be allowed the use of both Longswords AND Scimitars. </p><p></p><p>And this way Commoners won't be as screwed <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Friend of the Dork, post: 5736119, member: 91954"] [b]Good idea[/b] Except, Martial Weapon Proficiency feat only gives you ONE proficiency, not all. And double-axes and swords should not be the same because of axe and sword are the same, but rather it's use as a double-weapon. I think I like the Weapon Groups as well, it could be based on the Figher ones: Exotic Axes, Heavy Blades, Light Blades, Bows, Close, Crossbows, Double etc. So a character taking Exotic Heavy Blade proficiency could use a Bastard Sword, Elven Curve Blade, Katana, No-Dachi. I'm not sure if we should allow overlap, like having double-bladed sword in both the Heavy Blade AND the Double group. But I'm inclined to allow it. A feat is pretty valuable, and being able to use several weapons is not that advantagous in this game as the system rewards specialization (magic item, feats, etc). I really like the suggestion... this will probably be in a future campaign at least. I'd allow the same for Martial Weapon and Simple Weapon feats, but ONLY the feats. Rogues will not suddenly become proficent with longswords because they can use Rapiers. But if they take Martial Heavy Blade prof. feat, I think they should be allowed the use of both Longswords AND Scimitars. And this way Commoners won't be as screwed ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is there a better way to handle Exotic Weapon Proficiency?
Top