Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is there a need for a simplified D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jmucchiello" data-source="post: 1759195" data-attributes="member: 813"><p>Note to self, Joe is a Narrativist. I am a gamist. Do not play any pick up games at conventions with Joe DMing.</p><p></p><p>You are reading this backwards. Have you ever look across a gap and said to yourself. I can jump that or I can't jump that? In general, looking out your eyes of your body, you know what you can and cannot do within a certain level of certainty.</p><p></p><p>In your example, if the DM tells me there's a 10 foot gap, I can look at my character's Jump ability and see what his chances are. Based on those chances I can determine the correct ROLE-PLAYING decision based on the character's personality. In prior editions, the DM had to make the decision for me: "Does Thrag think he can jump the pit?" DM: "Since YOU usually play him self-assured, he is sure he can make it."</p><p></p><p>Me, I'd rather play in the game where I interpret my character's self-assuredness rather than have the DM determine the chance of success based on his opinion.</p><p></p><p>ASIDE: I once GMed a game using no rules. The players wrote full backgrounds on their characters and I used them to generate percentages in my head and (in full gamist fashion) I then made sure that over the course of the game the percentages lined up. I had scratch note character sheets in a system that I used to keep track of how good the characters were at various tasks.</p><p></p><p>The players had nothing but my descriptions. After a time, one player had to drop out because, as he said to me, he didn't know what the character could do. Without a number on a sheet (any number), he had no way to make decisions about the character without basically flipping a coin.</p><p></p><p>That is why I don't like narrativist gaming. Whenever I GM now, I prefer a system where the player does not need to ask the GM "Does my character think he can do this?" GMs will answer based on personality. And thus they are playing the character, not the player. The GM should respond. "There is a 60% chance of success. You tell me if the character thinks he can succeed." But no GM is going to respond like that.</p><p></p><p>And none of this has anything to do with rules lite or not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jmucchiello, post: 1759195, member: 813"] Note to self, Joe is a Narrativist. I am a gamist. Do not play any pick up games at conventions with Joe DMing. You are reading this backwards. Have you ever look across a gap and said to yourself. I can jump that or I can't jump that? In general, looking out your eyes of your body, you know what you can and cannot do within a certain level of certainty. In your example, if the DM tells me there's a 10 foot gap, I can look at my character's Jump ability and see what his chances are. Based on those chances I can determine the correct ROLE-PLAYING decision based on the character's personality. In prior editions, the DM had to make the decision for me: "Does Thrag think he can jump the pit?" DM: "Since YOU usually play him self-assured, he is sure he can make it." Me, I'd rather play in the game where I interpret my character's self-assuredness rather than have the DM determine the chance of success based on his opinion. ASIDE: I once GMed a game using no rules. The players wrote full backgrounds on their characters and I used them to generate percentages in my head and (in full gamist fashion) I then made sure that over the course of the game the percentages lined up. I had scratch note character sheets in a system that I used to keep track of how good the characters were at various tasks. The players had nothing but my descriptions. After a time, one player had to drop out because, as he said to me, he didn't know what the character could do. Without a number on a sheet (any number), he had no way to make decisions about the character without basically flipping a coin. That is why I don't like narrativist gaming. Whenever I GM now, I prefer a system where the player does not need to ask the GM "Does my character think he can do this?" GMs will answer based on personality. And thus they are playing the character, not the player. The GM should respond. "There is a 60% chance of success. You tell me if the character thinks he can succeed." But no GM is going to respond like that. And none of this has anything to do with rules lite or not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is there a need for a simplified D&D?
Top