Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Is there a Parry in 3.5?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pbartender" data-source="post: 1776517" data-attributes="member: 7533"><p>Essentially, yes on both counts. You use the attack bonus of the attack which you are giving up.</p><p></p><p>Imagine a 6th-level fighter with a +2 Strength bonus and Two-Weapon Fighting. He is weilding a longsword in his primary hand, and a shortsword in his off-hand. He has a few options if he chooses to parry.</p><p></p><p>1. He makes a single parry attempt with his longsword. He makes the opposed Parry check at +8 (as if he made a single attack). The next round he can do one of two things...</p><p></p><p>First, he could take standard attack action. The attack was used up by the parry attempt, and he has a MEA left.</p><p></p><p>Second, he could take a full-attack action. His first attack was used up by the parry attempt, so the 'second' attack uses the next iteration, and he can make one attack at +3.</p><p></p><p>2. As above, but he decides that he'll want to use his off-hand weapon during the next round. He makes a single parry attempt with his longsword. This time, he makes the opposed Parry check at +6 (-2 for Two-Weapon Fighting). The next round, if take a full-attack action, he makes a 'second' attack at +1, and an off-hand attack with the shortsword at +6.</p><p></p><p>3. Also, if he makes a full-attack action (with or without the off-hand attack), he can make more than one parry, using the apprpriate attack bonuses.</p><p></p><p>4. The rule doesn't specify one way or the other, but feasibly, if your DM okays it, you could designate specific attacks for the parry. For example, the fighter above could get up to three attacks per round... +6 longsword, +1 longsword, and +6 shortsword. When making the parry attempt, you designate any one of the three attack bonuses as the one you will forgo to make the parry. That attack disappears from the following round.</p><p></p><p>Be aware that, though I didn't mention it above, there are bonuses and penalties for the size of weapon you use to parry, much like disarming.</p><p></p><p>With this method, two-weapon fighters can parry more often, more experienced fighters can parry more often and better.</p><p></p><p>The downside is that the actions of your next round get severly limited once you start parrying.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes I did... sorry. I'll fix that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, sort of... It's that whole 'something for nothing' thing you mentioned earlier. In games where there are few AoOs, it gives you something to do with them. In games where they are more common occurances, the players simply have to make a more difficult choice... Parry for less damage? Or save it for an possible AoO? It's a defensive vs. offensive question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pbartender, post: 1776517, member: 7533"] Essentially, yes on both counts. You use the attack bonus of the attack which you are giving up. Imagine a 6th-level fighter with a +2 Strength bonus and Two-Weapon Fighting. He is weilding a longsword in his primary hand, and a shortsword in his off-hand. He has a few options if he chooses to parry. 1. He makes a single parry attempt with his longsword. He makes the opposed Parry check at +8 (as if he made a single attack). The next round he can do one of two things... First, he could take standard attack action. The attack was used up by the parry attempt, and he has a MEA left. Second, he could take a full-attack action. His first attack was used up by the parry attempt, so the 'second' attack uses the next iteration, and he can make one attack at +3. 2. As above, but he decides that he'll want to use his off-hand weapon during the next round. He makes a single parry attempt with his longsword. This time, he makes the opposed Parry check at +6 (-2 for Two-Weapon Fighting). The next round, if take a full-attack action, he makes a 'second' attack at +1, and an off-hand attack with the shortsword at +6. 3. Also, if he makes a full-attack action (with or without the off-hand attack), he can make more than one parry, using the apprpriate attack bonuses. 4. The rule doesn't specify one way or the other, but feasibly, if your DM okays it, you could designate specific attacks for the parry. For example, the fighter above could get up to three attacks per round... +6 longsword, +1 longsword, and +6 shortsword. When making the parry attempt, you designate any one of the three attack bonuses as the one you will forgo to make the parry. That attack disappears from the following round. Be aware that, though I didn't mention it above, there are bonuses and penalties for the size of weapon you use to parry, much like disarming. With this method, two-weapon fighters can parry more often, more experienced fighters can parry more often and better. The downside is that the actions of your next round get severly limited once you start parrying. Yes I did... sorry. I'll fix that. Well, sort of... It's that whole 'something for nothing' thing you mentioned earlier. In games where there are few AoOs, it gives you something to do with them. In games where they are more common occurances, the players simply have to make a more difficult choice... Parry for less damage? Or save it for an possible AoO? It's a defensive vs. offensive question. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Is there a Parry in 3.5?
Top