Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is there any good reason for a spellcaster to not take the Archmage prestige class?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LordAO" data-source="post: 1389410" data-attributes="member: 6010"><p>Yeah, that's true. Skill Focus is anything but my favorite feat, and after Spell Focus was nerfed (horribly) in 3.5, I can see why people wouldn't want to be forced to take it, let alone have to take it twice.</p><p></p><p>I guess I'm not really sure if I like the Archmage and Heirophant prestige classes. They seem too powerful and too flavorless. The idea of a class based around being the most "advanced" Wizard or Priest just doesn't sit right with me. </p><p></p><p>Prestige Classes are supposed to provide the character with a special role for his or her character. There are definate roleplaying elements to this. Even classes as bland as the Master Alchemist provide a character with a roleplaying concept and a unique niche in the world. The Archmage and Heirophant just don't seem to do that. And until these two classes came out, no one prestige class was supposed to be more "prestige" than any other.</p><p></p><p>It would be like making a "Supreme Fighter" prestige class that is only 5 levels and gives a fighter super-duper weapon focus and super weapon specialization or something. The idea being someone who is more advanced than his "less disciplined, determined, and advanced" counterparts of the regular fighter class. Not exactly what I'd call an interesting or appealing concept.</p><p></p><p>Does anyone else know what I'm talking about? Or is this just turning into a pointless rant on my part? If so, I apologize.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LordAO, post: 1389410, member: 6010"] Yeah, that's true. Skill Focus is anything but my favorite feat, and after Spell Focus was nerfed (horribly) in 3.5, I can see why people wouldn't want to be forced to take it, let alone have to take it twice. I guess I'm not really sure if I like the Archmage and Heirophant prestige classes. They seem too powerful and too flavorless. The idea of a class based around being the most "advanced" Wizard or Priest just doesn't sit right with me. Prestige Classes are supposed to provide the character with a special role for his or her character. There are definate roleplaying elements to this. Even classes as bland as the Master Alchemist provide a character with a roleplaying concept and a unique niche in the world. The Archmage and Heirophant just don't seem to do that. And until these two classes came out, no one prestige class was supposed to be more "prestige" than any other. It would be like making a "Supreme Fighter" prestige class that is only 5 levels and gives a fighter super-duper weapon focus and super weapon specialization or something. The idea being someone who is more advanced than his "less disciplined, determined, and advanced" counterparts of the regular fighter class. Not exactly what I'd call an interesting or appealing concept. Does anyone else know what I'm talking about? Or is this just turning into a pointless rant on my part? If so, I apologize. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is there any good reason for a spellcaster to not take the Archmage prestige class?
Top