Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tun Kai Poh" data-source="post: 8451183" data-attributes="member: 6761960">My rankings for 4e-like tactical RPGs (that I've played) are as follows:Player character creation and development - diversity of builds<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">D&D 4th Edition/Essentials - For sheer variety of builds and abilities, 4e is still unbeatable. I collected the books up until Heroes of Shadow, and I had the Essentials books (although one of them has gone missing). Some books were better than others - Divine Power, for instance, was full of really good stuff in my opinion (and I watched my players make full use of the Paladin and Invoker powers). Whereas Heroes of Shadow had some good concepts but not so much good execution. If only we still had the online character builder...</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">LANCER - The game's gradual accumulation of mech licenses (29 in the core book) - from which you can pick-and-choose various components, weapons and software to build your dream fighting machine - is a winning concept. It helps that even the starting mech and its huge weapons list is already quite flexible and powerful, so players feel like they have a lot of good choices right from the start. Expansions The Long Rim and No Room For A Wallflower Part 1 add some useful new mechs and alternate frames, allowing for martial arts mechs, time manipulation and other unique tactics. LANCER gets a big boost for having COMP/CON, a highly polished online character builder/tracker that blows every other character builder out of the water.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">LANCER: Battlegroup - Caveat: this TTRPG isn't officially released yet, but I'm going by the 1.9.6 version of the rules. Players get 24 capital ship hull types to play (your character gets 2-6 ships to command in their battlegroup), with a plethora of various superheavy, primary and secondary weapons, as well as various ship systems, escort vessels and wings (fighters and mechs). Although the dice mechanics are similar to LANCER's, the entire fleet-building system is quite different. It's simpler, more like list-building in a point-based wargame, except with the caveat that you have to consider how your character's battlegroup synergizes with the rest of the party (a 5-player fleet could have as many as 30 ships). Different ships have different slot types so you can't literally combine any weapon or system with any ship, and after a while certain build archetypes do start to show up more often.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">13th Age - The 9 core classes are relatively well-balanced, but some of the simpler classes (Barbarian, Paladin) lack depth by design, so there's only so much players can do with them. You really want to get the 13 True Ways book, with 6 new classes (not all of which are good - Chaos Mage, I'm looking at you) and more importantly, multi-classing rules that give players a lot more room to play with. The multi-classing is better than 4e's version, even if the variety of classes and powers isn't up there.</li> </ol>Player tactical space - interesting and meaningful options in battle<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">LANCER - This game came on the tail of years of development and playtesting, and clearly builds on 4e's gameplay innovations. It shows. Players feel strong and capable from the start. Play occurs on a grid or hex map, and flying units add extra spice to this. You get one move and one full action (or two quick actions) each turn, plus a reaction on each turn (including each enemy's turn!), and within these limitations you can be a lot of things: a gunner, a melee hitter, a hacker, a combat engineer who deploys turrets and barriers, and more. Often two or more of these in the same round. The heat system lets you push your luck for extra quick actions, and some mech builds gain benefits from overheating, so it's an entire category of tactics to play with. Each mech also has a core power that can be used once per adventure, somewhat like 4e's action points (when used with paragon or epic powers for specific effects), and these can be game-changers too. And like 4e, there are limited resources (including repairs and core powers) that players must manage over the course of an adventure, so players have to pace their usage of these.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">D&D 4th Edition/Essentials - 4e came out almost 14 years ago, and many games have tried to build upon its tactical innovations, but 4e is still one of the top systems for empowering players to do exciting and meaningful things in battle. When a Defender hits with an attack of opportunity, it's more than just hit points, it's an event horizon closing upon the enemy's future options. Leaders determine the pace of battle and the endurance of their party members. Strikers play the hit point reduction game. Controllers...control. When 4e is running, and the players are on the ball, it just feels really, really good. There are many caveats to this, because gameplay changes as you level up into Paragon and Epic, and fights can get wildly complex, but there are more good levels of play than bad ones, by far.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">LANCER: Battlegroup - Every player battlegroup gets two actions - one maneuver and one tactic, or just two tactics, and the limited maneuver space (the gyre of combat on which ships more is basically a line with six positions on it) means that fights have a certain shape that they all fall into. Battlegroups that dance at extreme or long range, firing targeting lasers and waiting for their charge guns to power up (which can take up to 4 rounds), while others dive to shorter ranges and find themselves absorbing enormous amounts of damage and casualties. Fights have a definite time limit before ships get drawn closer and the combat gyre tightens into short ranges. Also, in a 2-3 player skirmish, it feels quite balanced, but when there are 4 or more battlegroups on each side, whichever ships dive first tend to get focus fired into oblivion, or overrun with enemy boarding parties. It can be discouraging for players to charge in first and find themselves being hammered hard, although there are builds and teamwork tactics that can alleviate this. Don't get me wrong, though. The game has gone through plenty of playtesting and balancing, and there are many different ways for players to fight, whether it's fishing for critical hits, using escorts and wings to swarm enemies for damage without having to make hit rolls, or the aforementioned long-range sniper builds. And there is no other roleplaying game where space combat feels this...big. Combat rounds cover hours of game time, but take just minutes to play through. Battles last days and cost thousands of lives. Boarding actions involve hundreds of marines and mechs fighting over multiple decks of multiple ships in the same battlegroup. Spinal petajoule kinetic cannons punch a hole clean through a battleship, and then destroy the smaller escort behind it, all in the same shot. And occasionally, the player who has charged all the way into point-blank range, all their ships gone save one, giving the order: "Ramming speed!"</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">13th Age - okay, there's no grid, although the engagement/disengagement and range band system sort of emulates this in a fuzzy way. But for a "4e-lite," 13th Age manages to carve out interesting areas of design space where it improves on its parent. The Escalation Die, a combat timer that increases hit probabilities (and affects a few powers) as time goes on. Reading natural dice rolls for extra effects (natural evens, natural odds, natural 2s all having different effects for some classes). And the big differentiator compared with 4e - every class plays very differently from the others! A sufficiently levelled barbarian becomes a whirling glass cannon of critical hit generation when it activates its rage. A bard juggles song effects, flexible attack rolls and spells with better action economy than anyone else. The monk chains combo moves with escalating impact, with devastating results if they get to the third turn of a combo. But again, not every class plays as tactically as the others, and most people will agree that the 13th Age fighter, while having some novelty value, doesn't hold a candle compared with its 4e counterpart.</li> </ol>GM ease of running - encounter balancing and handling multiple enemies in play<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">13th Age - Monster stat boxes that are easy to read and use, with some special powers activating on random triggers (the natural roll of the attack die), which reduces GM decision-making while still adding variety to gameplay. Encounter math that manages to be even tighter and better than 4e, despite having hit points that inflate higher in 10 levels of play than 4e did in 30 levels. A better "minion" system than 4e. And a huge variety of monsters when you include the bestiary, demon and adventure books. Roll on, Gelatinous Octohedron!</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">LANCER: Battlegroup - Some people may dislike how this game simplifies the enemy battleline and its movement - enemy ships don't really move, only player ships do - but it makes GMing a breeze. When you need to run a balanced base capture mission involving four player battlegroups containing 20 ships, there's already plenty to track without including NPC movement. The NPC flagship template system has some similarities to LANCER and 4e's useful monster templates, and while I would like more variety in enemy types, it is a core game without supplements, so it's understandable.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">LANCER - I'm going to be making some of the same comments - and complaints - for both LANCER and 4e. Enemies are abstracted compared with player characters, but they still have plenty of customization in terms of special abilities. There is more guidance in LANCER for different mission types, and it offers many templates to modify enemy mechs to create sub-bosses and extremely strong boss fights. But as a relatively mature game with a lot of player options, it becomes increasingly hard for GMs to prepare for what players are bringing to the table. A gauntlet mission involving an enemy blockade and a finish line is trivially hard for Lancers with access to the teleporting Sunzi mech license, for instance.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">D&D 4th Edition/Essentials - A mature and well-tested system, with all the innovations to make encounters easy to build, enemies easy to handle in play. But the first two gorgeous Monster Manuals (and the Draconomicons and Open Grave) have the older hit point and damage math which makes combat drag on and on... I'd still run this game if I had to, but I'd be careful to use MM3 monster math.</li> </ol>Systems I've read end-to-end but have not tried yet: ICON (LANCER-meets-Forged in the Dark, but with fantasy heroes instead of mechs) and Gubat Banwa (Forged in the Dark narrative framework, LANCER-like character building, 4e-influenced combat system). Both are still undergoing playtesting and I have yet to see how the balance shakes out.</blockquote>

Verification