Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this a fair review of PF2?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8059669" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>A few observations. Not 'cause I necessarily I agree with the man (or your transcript rather), but because it's otherwise too easy to write off his criticisms.</p><p></p><p>At first sight (and really a review can't be expected to look deeper than that) the game comes off as incredibly thought out and tidy. Scratch the surface, and any number of question marks pop up. Kudos to him finding some of them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah. 3.x/PF/d20 magic buying is loads of fun, and 5E deciding to drop it like a hot turd is one of the biggest flaws of that edition.</p><p></p><p>However, he's right it isn't as fun as it could have been. Why? Because while 3e (and 5e!) get magic items right (as opposed to pricing them, in 5e's case) PF2 gets them absolutely wrong. In fact, PF2 brings magic items* back to the 4E nightmare of anemic items that do incredibly little, and often with ridiculous limits on how and when you get the little benefit there is. Players simply can't be bothered to remember to use items when the benefits doesn't significantly bolster their characters' abilities.</p><p></p><p>*) except for fundamental runes (=striking weapon runes) but that just opens a different can of worms</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's even worse than that. You'd think invisibility augments sneaking, but by RAW it replaces it (both give the same condition). The condition of undetected seems to both mean "the enemy doesn't know where you are" and "the enemy doesn't even know something's there at all" simultaneously.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nothing new to a player of 3e/PF1 or 4e, though.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The game is definitely not for the math-averse, that is correct. </p><p></p><p>Let us stay on that topic for a sec:</p><p> </p><p>On the other hand, that's likely just his inexperience talking. </p><p></p><p>Assuming he's not maths-averse, that is. Like I said, this game absolutely requires players quick at doing basic algebra in their head. If you're not comfortable calculating 33+2-1+3+1-4+1=? in your head multiple times each round*, PF2 isn't for you. There are no shortcuts or easy cheatsheets. </p><p></p><p>You simply <em>must be</em> math-friendly. (Don't trust anyone downplaying this!) Luckily most PF1 fans, clearly Paizo's target demographic, seem to have no problems with this. (Me and our group are all a bunch of tech-loving nerds with Int as our by far best ability so this isn't a problem for us)</p><p></p><p>*) making an attack against a flanked foe (+2) using reach through a friend's square (-1) using your +3 weapon with bless +1 and it's your second attack in the round -4 (because it's an agile weapon) and you switched target from your first attack and got +1 because it's a sweep weapon. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Without listening to the video I can only say he's right, but likely not for the reasons you'd think. The crafting rules are so difficult to understand even now a year from release many Paizo gamers doesn't seem to get it right. In reality it's simple: the core benefit of crafting (i.e. item crafting as opposed to recall knowledge or doing field repairs) doesn't save or make you any money. Any money at all. They only ensure you have an Earn Income activity at your own level (instead of whatever level the settlement or GM offers you). The illusion of earning money comes from making more money than your friends stuck with the lower task level of the settlement or GM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 8059669, member: 12731"] A few observations. Not 'cause I necessarily I agree with the man (or your transcript rather), but because it's otherwise too easy to write off his criticisms. At first sight (and really a review can't be expected to look deeper than that) the game comes off as incredibly thought out and tidy. Scratch the surface, and any number of question marks pop up. Kudos to him finding some of them. Yeah. 3.x/PF/d20 magic buying is loads of fun, and 5E deciding to drop it like a hot turd is one of the biggest flaws of that edition. However, he's right it isn't as fun as it could have been. Why? Because while 3e (and 5e!) get magic items right (as opposed to pricing them, in 5e's case) PF2 gets them absolutely wrong. In fact, PF2 brings magic items* back to the 4E nightmare of anemic items that do incredibly little, and often with ridiculous limits on how and when you get the little benefit there is. Players simply can't be bothered to remember to use items when the benefits doesn't significantly bolster their characters' abilities. *) except for fundamental runes (=striking weapon runes) but that just opens a different can of worms It's even worse than that. You'd think invisibility augments sneaking, but by RAW it replaces it (both give the same condition). The condition of undetected seems to both mean "the enemy doesn't know where you are" and "the enemy doesn't even know something's there at all" simultaneously. Nothing new to a player of 3e/PF1 or 4e, though. The game is definitely not for the math-averse, that is correct. Let us stay on that topic for a sec: On the other hand, that's likely just his inexperience talking. Assuming he's not maths-averse, that is. Like I said, this game absolutely requires players quick at doing basic algebra in their head. If you're not comfortable calculating 33+2-1+3+1-4+1=? in your head multiple times each round*, PF2 isn't for you. There are no shortcuts or easy cheatsheets. You simply [I]must be[/I] math-friendly. (Don't trust anyone downplaying this!) Luckily most PF1 fans, clearly Paizo's target demographic, seem to have no problems with this. (Me and our group are all a bunch of tech-loving nerds with Int as our by far best ability so this isn't a problem for us) *) making an attack against a flanked foe (+2) using reach through a friend's square (-1) using your +3 weapon with bless +1 and it's your second attack in the round -4 (because it's an agile weapon) and you switched target from your first attack and got +1 because it's a sweep weapon. Without listening to the video I can only say he's right, but likely not for the reasons you'd think. The crafting rules are so difficult to understand even now a year from release many Paizo gamers doesn't seem to get it right. In reality it's simple: the core benefit of crafting (i.e. item crafting as opposed to recall knowledge or doing field repairs) doesn't save or make you any money. Any money at all. They only ensure you have an Earn Income activity at your own level (instead of whatever level the settlement or GM offers you). The illusion of earning money comes from making more money than your friends stuck with the lower task level of the settlement or GM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this a fair review of PF2?
Top