Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Luis Figoo" data-source="post: 385188" data-attributes="member: 7743">Unlikely, unless your alignment play is a one way trip only: Good-&gt;Evil. That would lead to illogical worldsHeh, why should i bother stating anything? I have asked a relevant rules question in a forum called D&amp;D rules. Think about itUsing yourself as a guideline for how other people should behave will always lead to disappoinment, you'll understand that someday. Btw, what is it i haven't learnt?Well it may be senseless to you, but look at my original question. Is there anything blocking this ruleswise? The logical assumption would then be that the rules are flawed somewhere. Sticking a patch with the words &quot;Its metagaming. Its the DM's job to shut this situation down&quot; does nothing to change the fact the rules are still flawed somewherePerfection may not exist but neither shoiuld one give up searching for itYeah but think about it. Seriously. D&amp;D is a group game, there are 3 ways to changei) DMii) Playeriii) The rulesi) and ii) will destroy the group dynamic (the first refers to the DM vs players position you proposed). iii) will create even ground, gues which one my group choseWell i would be great if you could make a list of your universal truths and post it for discussion in a philosphical forum. You would be surprisedHmm, either you fail to understand my posts or you have ignored points that do not fit your answer. I have repeatedly said that my DM will find a way (if possible ruleswise) to block this.You could try a WWA/GC combo (been there done that long time ago) in our game. Off the top of my head, heres a few more you could trySilly Simulacrum with EmpowerFabricate for cheap goldPlane jumping for endless spells for castersArmored constructsI think those were the latest tried</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Luis Figoo, post: 385188, member: 7743"] Unlikely, unless your alignment play is a one way trip only: Good->Evil. That would lead to illogical worlds Heh, why should i bother stating anything? I have asked a relevant rules question in a forum called D&D rules. Think about it Using yourself as a guideline for how other people should behave will always lead to disappoinment, you'll understand that someday. Btw, what is it i haven't learnt? Well it may be senseless to you, but look at my original question. Is there anything blocking this ruleswise? The logical assumption would then be that the rules are flawed somewhere. Sticking a patch with the words "Its metagaming. Its the DM's job to shut this situation down" does nothing to change the fact the rules are still flawed somewhere Perfection may not exist but neither shoiuld one give up searching for it Yeah but think about it. Seriously. D&D is a group game, there are 3 ways to change i) DM ii) Player iii) The rules i) and ii) will destroy the group dynamic (the first refers to the DM vs players position you proposed). iii) will create even ground, gues which one my group chose Well i would be great if you could make a list of your universal truths and post it for discussion in a philosphical forum. You would be surprised Hmm, either you fail to understand my posts or you have ignored points that do not fit your answer. I have repeatedly said that my DM will find a way (if possible ruleswise) to block this. You could try a WWA/GC combo (been there done that long time ago) in our game. Off the top of my head, heres a few more you could try Silly Simulacrum with Empower Fabricate for cheap gold Plane jumping for endless spells for casters Armored constructs I think those were the latest tried [/QUOTE]

Verification