Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 2695953" data-attributes="member: 1656"><a href="http://www.giantitp.com/cgi-bin/GiantITP/ootscript?SK=48" target="_blank">Heh.</a>Hmm.  It just feels like you're ruling on one point that's unclear, and then changing a bunch of rules that are clear to keep consistent with the initial ruling.  I'd rather rule the unclear point to be consistent with the already-defined rules.As written, attacking an opponent with a CLW is an 'armed' unarmed attack that doesn't provoke an AoO, and hitting someone with a mace doesn't provoke an AoO... so you're having to change those rules to remain consistent with your ruling for healing an unconscious ally.I'd prefer to rule the healing-the-ally situation to remain consistent with the no-AoO rules we already have for attacking with a CLW and attacking with a mace...-Hyp.</blockquote>