Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this an Attack of Opportunity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2702316" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Hard to do in this case.</p><p></p><p>Touch spells do not provoke.</p><p></p><p>Just like many other actions in the game do not provoke.</p><p></p><p>Adding a provoke when one does not exist seems inherently wrong to me. It seems like DM heavy handedness. It matters not which square an enemy is in, you provoke only when the rules say so.</p><p></p><p>At first, this seemed like an open-ended question. But, the more I investigated, the more it became clear that this was "wishful thinking".</p><p></p><p>To me, the provoke list should be one that is pretty much a solid list. You don't really add stuff to it.</p><p></p><p>It's not as if the book states "in cases of unusual movement, you should add an AoO".</p><p></p><p>The book never recommends adding an AoO for any reason. It lists when they occur. It also states that there could be some more (not that DMs should add more). This appears to be a minor quibble that they left it open-ended so that splat books and possibly other places in the core books that they missed could add to the list.</p><p></p><p>But, it seems crystal clear to me. Free actions do not ever provoke. Not An Action actions do not ever provoke. Just like a Quicken Spell does not provoke as a Swift Action, even though casting spells normally provokes. Free Actions, Immediate Actions, Swift Actions and Not An Action actions are just too fast to provoke.</p><p></p><p>To give them this quality of equating to Move Actions and Standard Actions that are slower and take more effort and sometimes do provoke seems inherently wrong to me. Next, someone will be wanting to give an AoO because someone is in the same square, or because a character is moving on a horse (note: doing an AoO on the horse is fine, not the rider), or against a Familiar because a Familiar is on a PCs shoulder when the PC moves, or for a soft fall off a horse (which btw is a No Action action) because they see it as movement.</p><p></p><p>Quite frankly, I'm kind of surprised that you have not "switched sides" in this. Your position appears to be that although Touch Spells do not provoke, you want to make them provoke for this special circumstance. Very strange.</p><p></p><p>There are times when the rules appear to be a shade of gray. This does not appear to be one of those times. You want me to admit there is a shade of gray when one does not exist. Sorry, no can do. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2702316, member: 2011"] Hard to do in this case. Touch spells do not provoke. Just like many other actions in the game do not provoke. Adding a provoke when one does not exist seems inherently wrong to me. It seems like DM heavy handedness. It matters not which square an enemy is in, you provoke only when the rules say so. At first, this seemed like an open-ended question. But, the more I investigated, the more it became clear that this was "wishful thinking". To me, the provoke list should be one that is pretty much a solid list. You don't really add stuff to it. It's not as if the book states "in cases of unusual movement, you should add an AoO". The book never recommends adding an AoO for any reason. It lists when they occur. It also states that there could be some more (not that DMs should add more). This appears to be a minor quibble that they left it open-ended so that splat books and possibly other places in the core books that they missed could add to the list. But, it seems crystal clear to me. Free actions do not ever provoke. Not An Action actions do not ever provoke. Just like a Quicken Spell does not provoke as a Swift Action, even though casting spells normally provokes. Free Actions, Immediate Actions, Swift Actions and Not An Action actions are just too fast to provoke. To give them this quality of equating to Move Actions and Standard Actions that are slower and take more effort and sometimes do provoke seems inherently wrong to me. Next, someone will be wanting to give an AoO because someone is in the same square, or because a character is moving on a horse (note: doing an AoO on the horse is fine, not the rider), or against a Familiar because a Familiar is on a PCs shoulder when the PC moves, or for a soft fall off a horse (which btw is a No Action action) because they see it as movement. Quite frankly, I'm kind of surprised that you have not "switched sides" in this. Your position appears to be that although Touch Spells do not provoke, you want to make them provoke for this special circumstance. Very strange. There are times when the rules appear to be a shade of gray. This does not appear to be one of those times. You want me to admit there is a shade of gray when one does not exist. Sorry, no can do. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this an Attack of Opportunity?
Top