Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this combo as broken as I think it is?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2255150" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>It is unusual at best and could take the PCs by surprise the first time until they figure it out.</p><p></p><p>The archmage case does not really allow for the "polymorphed wizard tactics" since enemy fighter types can get in and attack normally (their offensive magic is not suppressed in the unaffected square of the wizard) Plus, since it is entire squares, something as simple as Greater Magic Arrows can defeat it. It does, however, allow for leaving a tunnel to the wizard so that he can cast out, but if there is a tunnel out, there is a tunnel in.</p><p></p><p>The ESA case (if allowed) does not allow for casting out of the area, so the wizard is limited to "polymorphed wizard tactics". No Shouting at the roof of the cave to collapse it tactics in the ESA case. No Quicken Dispel Magic underwater in the ESA case. Hence, a lot of spells have to be cast to make the wizard an effective fighter type (AC boost spells, Polymorph, Tensor's Transformation, etc.). Plus, a DM might rule that the Antimagic Field has to be cast last (he might rule that you cannot cast in the Antimagic Field, even if you are not affected by it yourself). Well, you cannot cast it after Tensor's because you cannot cast while transformed by Tensor's.</p><p></p><p>Both of these Shaped Antimagic Field approaches limit the Wizard in what he can do after he casts the spell.</p><p></p><p>I think Globe of Invulnerability type spells are much more potent at lower levels than this one is at higher levels, but those are not broken either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2255150, member: 2011"] It is unusual at best and could take the PCs by surprise the first time until they figure it out. The archmage case does not really allow for the "polymorphed wizard tactics" since enemy fighter types can get in and attack normally (their offensive magic is not suppressed in the unaffected square of the wizard) Plus, since it is entire squares, something as simple as Greater Magic Arrows can defeat it. It does, however, allow for leaving a tunnel to the wizard so that he can cast out, but if there is a tunnel out, there is a tunnel in. The ESA case (if allowed) does not allow for casting out of the area, so the wizard is limited to "polymorphed wizard tactics". No Shouting at the roof of the cave to collapse it tactics in the ESA case. No Quicken Dispel Magic underwater in the ESA case. Hence, a lot of spells have to be cast to make the wizard an effective fighter type (AC boost spells, Polymorph, Tensor's Transformation, etc.). Plus, a DM might rule that the Antimagic Field has to be cast last (he might rule that you cannot cast in the Antimagic Field, even if you are not affected by it yourself). Well, you cannot cast it after Tensor's because you cannot cast while transformed by Tensor's. Both of these Shaped Antimagic Field approaches limit the Wizard in what he can do after he casts the spell. I think Globe of Invulnerability type spells are much more potent at lower levels than this one is at higher levels, but those are not broken either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this combo as broken as I think it is?
Top