Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is this fair? -- your personal opinion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3023979" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>It's really the combination of the two. No clues + instant nigh-unavoidable death = not fair. This is why I drew the comparison to "you walk out the left door and you catch a deadly disease." There are no clues, and it's nigh-unavoidable death. There is no in-character reason to suspect that left door, and there is not significantly more in-character reason to suspect that lever (one assumes this lever didn't just stand out by being a lever in a room, that levers exist in this party's experience that did not kill you). If it had no clue and did something less deadly and more challenging, it would be more fair. If it had big clues to it's deadly consequences, it would be more fair.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just because people get lucky doesn't mean that requiring them to get the best possible "trump card" result is fair. You can win a hand of poker with a pair of fives, but that doesn't make a pair of fives a good hand.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Significantly more fair, because that would represent a danger overcome for the character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>ThirdWizard and Bagpuss have both given examples of trapped levers that I'd find perfectly fair.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This would make it immensely more logical, and definately more fair, because it would give them a chance to avoid it. If they push the button that says DO NOT PUSH, feel free to zap 'em. This is more similar to my style of DMing where I don't balk at big explosions, but I do paint the barrels bright red and show some exploding before I jam one in a hole with a PC.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would say they are fair enough, or at least significantly more fair. It doesn't seem as arbitrary if it makes sense. I go for the first result myself, more often than not, but the second result is an option that is still more realistic (though, IMHO, it lacks some teeth). </p><p></p><p>That still doesn't get into the rogue not finding the trap (a search DC of how high?), or the CR of the trap being taken into account with XP awards and treasure tables, or why the trap is instant-death instead of something a bit more less binary, but I think we can agree that those are secondary to the concerns about the fairness of the trap itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3023979, member: 2067"] It's really the combination of the two. No clues + instant nigh-unavoidable death = not fair. This is why I drew the comparison to "you walk out the left door and you catch a deadly disease." There are no clues, and it's nigh-unavoidable death. There is no in-character reason to suspect that left door, and there is not significantly more in-character reason to suspect that lever (one assumes this lever didn't just stand out by being a lever in a room, that levers exist in this party's experience that did not kill you). If it had no clue and did something less deadly and more challenging, it would be more fair. If it had big clues to it's deadly consequences, it would be more fair. Just because people get lucky doesn't mean that requiring them to get the best possible "trump card" result is fair. You can win a hand of poker with a pair of fives, but that doesn't make a pair of fives a good hand. Significantly more fair, because that would represent a danger overcome for the character. ThirdWizard and Bagpuss have both given examples of trapped levers that I'd find perfectly fair. This would make it immensely more logical, and definately more fair, because it would give them a chance to avoid it. If they push the button that says DO NOT PUSH, feel free to zap 'em. This is more similar to my style of DMing where I don't balk at big explosions, but I do paint the barrels bright red and show some exploding before I jam one in a hole with a PC. I would say they are fair enough, or at least significantly more fair. It doesn't seem as arbitrary if it makes sense. I go for the first result myself, more often than not, but the second result is an option that is still more realistic (though, IMHO, it lacks some teeth). That still doesn't get into the rogue not finding the trap (a search DC of how high?), or the CR of the trap being taken into account with XP awards and treasure tables, or why the trap is instant-death instead of something a bit more less binary, but I think we can agree that those are secondary to the concerns about the fairness of the trap itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is this fair? -- your personal opinion
Top