Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is this fair? -- your personal opinion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThirdWizard" data-source="post: 3047396" data-attributes="member: 12037"><p>Okay, so by your reasoning here, there's no such thing as unfairness. The DM is God and all he does cannot be wrong. Because, that's what you sound like here, and if that's what you think, then your bias in this thread is going to make this debate impossible.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Totally unfounded and horrible analogy. Fairness isn't like following the law. Fairness is something the DM watches as he designs obstacles for the PCs to overcome.</p><p></p><p>Second you see my "I can't determine fairness one way or the other without more information" to mean "I think the DM is acting unfairly unless otherwise proven." You do realize, dont you, that you could just as well say my stance was "I think the DM is acting fairly unless otherwise proven?" And, just for the record, those are <em>both</em> wrong.</p><p></p><p>When dealing in hypotheticals, I need information to make an informed oppinion. I find this <em>highly</em> better than your way of dealing with it in which everything is fair unless somene can prove to you that it isn't. </p><p></p><p>Again, your bias in this matter is showing through. How can you expect to debate when you are so clearly biased toward "fair" being the default, even when no information is given whatsoever? That is like a scientist declaring his hypothesis to be proven correct because his experiment was inconclusive.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay here it is for you again:</p><p></p><p><strong>Fairness is like fun. It is subjective.</strong></p><p></p><p>Fairness must be applied to context. See the sword duel example above. Give a judo master and a kendo master swords and tell them to fight. That's not fair. You can't just take everything out of context.</p><p></p><p>You surely cannot believe that there is a 100% objectively fair trap scenario that would be fair for all groups everywhere. Surely! Because that's what objectively means, by definition.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It isn't a falacy.</p><p></p><p>Raven, its like you're trying to prove what is objectively fun. I'm sorry, there is no formula to follow. But, if you want to know what is fun, you can poll a large number of people. If a lot of people find it fun, then you can be safe claiming it to be fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThirdWizard, post: 3047396, member: 12037"] Okay, so by your reasoning here, there's no such thing as unfairness. The DM is God and all he does cannot be wrong. Because, that's what you sound like here, and if that's what you think, then your bias in this thread is going to make this debate impossible. Totally unfounded and horrible analogy. Fairness isn't like following the law. Fairness is something the DM watches as he designs obstacles for the PCs to overcome. Second you see my "I can't determine fairness one way or the other without more information" to mean "I think the DM is acting unfairly unless otherwise proven." You do realize, dont you, that you could just as well say my stance was "I think the DM is acting fairly unless otherwise proven?" And, just for the record, those are [i]both[/i] wrong. When dealing in hypotheticals, I need information to make an informed oppinion. I find this [i]highly[/i] better than your way of dealing with it in which everything is fair unless somene can prove to you that it isn't. Again, your bias in this matter is showing through. How can you expect to debate when you are so clearly biased toward "fair" being the default, even when no information is given whatsoever? That is like a scientist declaring his hypothesis to be proven correct because his experiment was inconclusive. Okay here it is for you again: [b]Fairness is like fun. It is subjective.[/b] Fairness must be applied to context. See the sword duel example above. Give a judo master and a kendo master swords and tell them to fight. That's not fair. You can't just take everything out of context. You surely cannot believe that there is a 100% objectively fair trap scenario that would be fair for all groups everywhere. Surely! Because that's what objectively means, by definition. It isn't a falacy. Raven, its like you're trying to prove what is objectively fun. I'm sorry, there is no formula to follow. But, if you want to know what is fun, you can poll a large number of people. If a lot of people find it fun, then you can be safe claiming it to be fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is this fair? -- your personal opinion
Top