Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this fair?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Planeswalker Maloran" data-source="post: 3743942" data-attributes="member: 55061"><p>I have seen good and evil characters interact quite well, as long as their immediate goals were similar and neither did anything to upset or disgust the other. The good fighter wants to kill the evil monster that's threatening the town (and will gladly take its loot as a reward). The evil mage wants the monster's loot, and will gladly use the monster for target practice on the way. As long as the DM provides quests that accomplish both good and personal gain, good and evil characters can get along just fine if they want to.</p><p></p><p>That said, Kmart Kommando summed it up really well with Chaotic Retarded and Lawful Stupid. A chaotic evil character might live perfectly well in a good society, and never cause more trouble than disturbing the peace. He won't go on a rampage unless he truly believes he can get away with it; which typically would mean he's an idiot, because no matter how powerful you are, there's someone stronger. He'll cause as much trouble as he can get away with, and no more, unless he gets aggravated to the breaking point and just snaps.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, a Paladin who lusts for the kill is blatantly evil, even if he only goes after evil things. There is a huge difference between protecting a village from goblin raiding parties, and attempting the annihilation of all goblins everywhere. There is a fine line between punishment, revenge, and "preventative" genocide.</p><p></p><p>So, good and evil characters can get along just as well as lawful and chaotic characters can, and both can fit in equally well in the typical adventuring party, as long as they are played intelligently and with some degree of maturity.</p><p></p><p>Now, if your players are too immature to play them right, I'd say by all means forbid evil characters. Maybe forbid Paladins, at the same time, as immature players almost always play lawful good and chaotic evil exactly the same "except for the dialog".</p><p></p><p>However, I disagree with Kmart Kommando about one thing. While chaotic evil people are often sociopaths, a great many of them are not in fact locked up or shot. A trait shared by a great many sociopaths is the level of intelligence required to seem like normal, functional members of society; amusing themselves by doing as much emotional and psychological damage as possible, while seeming quite innocent of any intentional wrongdoing. Only those who lack finess typically resort to violence and are locked away or executed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Planeswalker Maloran, post: 3743942, member: 55061"] I have seen good and evil characters interact quite well, as long as their immediate goals were similar and neither did anything to upset or disgust the other. The good fighter wants to kill the evil monster that's threatening the town (and will gladly take its loot as a reward). The evil mage wants the monster's loot, and will gladly use the monster for target practice on the way. As long as the DM provides quests that accomplish both good and personal gain, good and evil characters can get along just fine if they want to. That said, Kmart Kommando summed it up really well with Chaotic Retarded and Lawful Stupid. A chaotic evil character might live perfectly well in a good society, and never cause more trouble than disturbing the peace. He won't go on a rampage unless he truly believes he can get away with it; which typically would mean he's an idiot, because no matter how powerful you are, there's someone stronger. He'll cause as much trouble as he can get away with, and no more, unless he gets aggravated to the breaking point and just snaps. On the other hand, a Paladin who lusts for the kill is blatantly evil, even if he only goes after evil things. There is a huge difference between protecting a village from goblin raiding parties, and attempting the annihilation of all goblins everywhere. There is a fine line between punishment, revenge, and "preventative" genocide. So, good and evil characters can get along just as well as lawful and chaotic characters can, and both can fit in equally well in the typical adventuring party, as long as they are played intelligently and with some degree of maturity. Now, if your players are too immature to play them right, I'd say by all means forbid evil characters. Maybe forbid Paladins, at the same time, as immature players almost always play lawful good and chaotic evil exactly the same "except for the dialog". However, I disagree with Kmart Kommando about one thing. While chaotic evil people are often sociopaths, a great many of them are not in fact locked up or shot. A trait shared by a great many sociopaths is the level of intelligence required to seem like normal, functional members of society; amusing themselves by doing as much emotional and psychological damage as possible, while seeming quite innocent of any intentional wrongdoing. Only those who lack finess typically resort to violence and are locked away or executed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is this fair?
Top