Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is this legal?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Altalazar" data-source="post: 2644985" data-attributes="member: 939"><p>If it is purely a process, actually, it may not be copyrightable and therefore it may not be a derivative work under copyright. </p><p></p><p>If I write a book and make up a formula in it, that formula is a process. The book and its description of how to use it can be copyrighted. The formula cannot be. Another book describing, in different words, indepedently created, could also talk about the formula or otherwise use it. As could a computer program. Because you can't copyright a process like that. To use a very basic example, if you came up with a contest and set up instructions on how to enter that, say, included using your social security number as your entry code (a bad idea these days...) your text describing the contest could be copyrighted, but the part about how to enter using the social security code could not be copyrighted - someone else is free to make their own contest using the exact same method of entering the contest. In fact, they could use the same text describing it as well, because there are only so many ways to describe such a thing. </p><p></p><p>Central to Copyright is the fact that you CANNOT copyright an idea ONLY an expression of that idea. And it is not like a patent - if someone else indpenendtly comes up with an IDENTICAL expression they can copyright it themselves and use it and there is no violation. </p><p></p><p>Because you can't copyright an idea, there are some expressions that can't be copyrighted - for instance, if an idea has only a handful (or even just one) way of being expressed, then it CANNOT be copyrighted, because then you could just write that one way or handful of ways down and you'd essentially bar anyone else from using that idea because all ways of expressing it would be under your copyright. But since you can't copyright an idea, you can't get away with that and now that idea, and all ways of expressing it, cannot be copyrighted and anyone can use any of them. </p><p></p><p>Ok, enough ... I think we've digressed enough. But I do find it telling that Wizard's legal already approved the legal page. As expected. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I would suggest that you ask them about it specifically before removing any text from it, seeing that they already approved it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Altalazar, post: 2644985, member: 939"] If it is purely a process, actually, it may not be copyrightable and therefore it may not be a derivative work under copyright. If I write a book and make up a formula in it, that formula is a process. The book and its description of how to use it can be copyrighted. The formula cannot be. Another book describing, in different words, indepedently created, could also talk about the formula or otherwise use it. As could a computer program. Because you can't copyright a process like that. To use a very basic example, if you came up with a contest and set up instructions on how to enter that, say, included using your social security number as your entry code (a bad idea these days...) your text describing the contest could be copyrighted, but the part about how to enter using the social security code could not be copyrighted - someone else is free to make their own contest using the exact same method of entering the contest. In fact, they could use the same text describing it as well, because there are only so many ways to describe such a thing. Central to Copyright is the fact that you CANNOT copyright an idea ONLY an expression of that idea. And it is not like a patent - if someone else indpenendtly comes up with an IDENTICAL expression they can copyright it themselves and use it and there is no violation. Because you can't copyright an idea, there are some expressions that can't be copyrighted - for instance, if an idea has only a handful (or even just one) way of being expressed, then it CANNOT be copyrighted, because then you could just write that one way or handful of ways down and you'd essentially bar anyone else from using that idea because all ways of expressing it would be under your copyright. But since you can't copyright an idea, you can't get away with that and now that idea, and all ways of expressing it, cannot be copyrighted and anyone can use any of them. Ok, enough ... I think we've digressed enough. But I do find it telling that Wizard's legal already approved the legal page. As expected. ;) I would suggest that you ask them about it specifically before removing any text from it, seeing that they already approved it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is this legal?
Top