Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 2652237" data-attributes="member: 94">You knock it off, Mark. I'm really not in the mood for yet another pissing match with you. I wasn't singling you out for anything (you might notice that Biggus Geekus' post is more directly at odds with my 'analysis') so don't pick a fight with me and then tell me to knock it off.Your posts were elitist, unhelpful, at best irrelevant, and at worst inaccurate. Don't pop into the thread and friggin quiz people over what they may or may not have done wrong with regards to the license. THAT is your high water mark for being helpful?Read your first post, and consider its applicability to Sage's question. Was it inaccurate or irrelevant?Re-read your subsequent posts as well. You led the conversation astray, convinced other uninformed posters to pile on behind you, and discouraged Sage from even trying.One would almost think you had some sort of vested interest in being unhelpful.You are most certainly very welcome. Your hyperlinked SRD is extremely useful and I am happy to help you in return.I haven't studied it, but in the first place I highly doubt there's a smooth mathematical formula to the table, and in the second place, you very specifically don't want to do anything that deliberately "copies" that table. If you find yourself referring to that table at all, in fact, you have crossed the line.</blockquote>