Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 2463501" data-attributes="member: 17296">I still say that intent will have a lot to do with whether it's an evil act. But given that you assign all act a good or evil descriptor, and no acts are given a neutral descriptor, I have to assign giving someone a disease (for any reason) as evil, but with (a LOT) fewer evil points than killing someone (for any reason). And, of course, if you do both at the same time the results don't stack! They're the same time of 'bonus' after all. (heh)However, given your statement number two, it's pretty easy to agree with you overall. Starting out that all things have either a good/evil/or neutral (because some things just can't be slotted either way) value attached to them, people seem to overlook the 'neutral' alignment as someone who can and does and NEEDS TO do evil acts. If you're claiming to a neutral alignment and you do exclusively neutrally or goodly valued acts, you're behaving as a good alignment and need your alignment changed.</blockquote>