Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is this what you went through with 3rd Edition?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 4117929" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I missed the 2e-3e transition discussions, because at that time I wasn't interested in RPGing (although I had played D&D before that). So my comments here apply to what I thought when I picked up the 3e core books in 2001, while the gaming community had been playing 3e since a year already, and compared the 3e rules with OD&D and AD&D 2e (although I wasn't an expert with them, I had played both).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't know the intricacies of OD&D and AD&D because I had only played with their core rules. 3e gave me immediately the impression of being MORE intricate and tactically interesting.</p><p></p><p>It also gave me the impression of being more simple to remember (d20 rolls, saving throws) and more streamlined (skills and feats system, multiclassing rules). Since I didn't consider the difficulty of the correspondent previous edition rules as a value, these immediately seemed an improvement to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All the big sacred cows were there, even those I wasn't very fond of, so yes it felt like the same game.</p><p></p><p>What started to feel different after a year or so was the abundance of discussions about "builds" and the attitude towards powerplaying and trying to break the system. Internet however had a major effect on this, because it made every little "bug" universally known.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I felt like 3e was flexible enough to support all previous styles at least.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely utterly not! With the 3e skill system, a MAJOR attention was dedicated to "everything else beside combat". Also a large amount of spells were designed to be useful in non-combat situations.</p><p></p><p>3.5 made it certainly worse: skills started to become cheaper for example (indirect psychological effect of making something cheaper, is that it often lowers the interest in it), and spells were oriented more to combat particularly to damage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Considering that with TSR the game was at best stabilized with negative hit points, at least the gimmickery was bringing it back...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It still got the traditional races, classes and monsters in core, vancian magic with most of the old spells, it's got all the sacred cows, and the general idea about how an adventure looks like (difficult, with high degree of mortality and quickly draining your resources). That's pretty much like precious D&D versions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 4117929, member: 1465"] I missed the 2e-3e transition discussions, because at that time I wasn't interested in RPGing (although I had played D&D before that). So my comments here apply to what I thought when I picked up the 3e core books in 2001, while the gaming community had been playing 3e since a year already, and compared the 3e rules with OD&D and AD&D 2e (although I wasn't an expert with them, I had played both). I didn't know the intricacies of OD&D and AD&D because I had only played with their core rules. 3e gave me immediately the impression of being MORE intricate and tactically interesting. It also gave me the impression of being more simple to remember (d20 rolls, saving throws) and more streamlined (skills and feats system, multiclassing rules). Since I didn't consider the difficulty of the correspondent previous edition rules as a value, these immediately seemed an improvement to me. All the big sacred cows were there, even those I wasn't very fond of, so yes it felt like the same game. What started to feel different after a year or so was the abundance of discussions about "builds" and the attitude towards powerplaying and trying to break the system. Internet however had a major effect on this, because it made every little "bug" universally known. I felt like 3e was flexible enough to support all previous styles at least. Absolutely utterly not! With the 3e skill system, a MAJOR attention was dedicated to "everything else beside combat". Also a large amount of spells were designed to be useful in non-combat situations. 3.5 made it certainly worse: skills started to become cheaper for example (indirect psychological effect of making something cheaper, is that it often lowers the interest in it), and spells were oriented more to combat particularly to damage. Considering that with TSR the game was at best stabilized with negative hit points, at least the gimmickery was bringing it back... It still got the traditional races, classes and monsters in core, vancian magic with most of the old spells, it's got all the sacred cows, and the general idea about how an adventure looks like (difficult, with high degree of mortality and quickly draining your resources). That's pretty much like precious D&D versions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is this what you went through with 3rd Edition?
Top