Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="solkanar33" data-source="post: 4118050" data-attributes="member: 60755">I can only speak for myself, of course. But at the time they announced 3E, it was clear for me and my group that 2e had become a horribly broken game. While it was soon clear that 3E was going to have problems of its own, I highly anticipated that edition because the better streamlining and great flexibility was a great boon. I was (and still am) convinced that 3E is a better system than 2e. And that showed from the start.Now on the other hand, I don't have the idea that 3.5 is a bad system. It has its issues, but basically its far from the monstrosity 2e was at the end of the '90's.I do like some aspects of 4E, but the system as a whole does't capture my imagination like 3e did. It 's a different system, but I'm still not convinced that it will be a better system. It looks more restrictive, it has too few classes and too many powers just look the same.I guess a lot of people have, to some degree, the same reservations.So for me, the situation now is very different from the one when 3e came out.</blockquote>