Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mmadsen" data-source="post: 3702150" data-attributes="member: 1645">Tweet's article on <a href="http://www.jonathantweet.com/jotgamesgrogs.html" target="_blank">Grogs in Ars Magica</a> seems topical: One aspect of troupe-style play in Ars Magica is the “grog.” “Grogs,” in Hermetic jargon, are the guards, watchmen, and bodyguards that work for a wizards’ covenant. In table terms, a grog is a named NPC that players can play but not keep. They have a much higher mortality rate than the magi and companions. A story from a friend of Mark’s and mine was one of the inspirations for the grog. This guy Scott ran a creative D&D campaign. He told us about a ferocious monster that he created to teach the cocksure players a lesson. “It tore them apart,” Scott said. Mark and I were impressed that he was willing to gun for the PCs like that. “How many characters did you kill?” I asked. “Oh, none,” he admitted. Thus was born the concept of the “grogs.” The problem with story-oriented play is that the campaign can’t bear to lose main characters. But without the threat of death, combat can lose its drama. Grogs are a solution to that tension. They can die in combat without driving the adventure or campaign into a ditch. Grogs serve secondary purposes as well. If you have a magus or companion that doesn’t do much in combat, you can play a grog on the side, and then you have something to do during a battle. It also works pretty well to run your own character’s bodyguard. Grogs allow the players to scale an adventure. If the adventure is tough, bring more grogs. If you don’t play a wizard or companion, you can play the whole grog contingent. Grogs started as a way to bring the threat of death back to story-oriented campaigns, but they also serve other functions in troupe-style play.Old-school D&D certainly involved more "red shirts" than the modern version seems to.</blockquote>

Verification