Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is wanting to destroy the world really all that evil?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Horror" data-source="post: 1958597" data-attributes="member: 26472"><p>Interesting that you say that. Just two weeks ago I was asked to describe the different alignment options to my players. I described it as something like this: There are two scales. On the one scale you have people that believe in law, order and justice. They believe that there is a system in place and that the system is there to protect their rights. On the other end of this scale are the people who disregard the system. They may or may not understand the system that governs society, or they may see it as flawed and choose to completely disregard it in favour of their own judgement. In between the two extremes are people that understand the system and may or may not understand the need for it. However, these people also understand that rules and regulations cannot always be right and thusly may at times opt to break the rules if the situation warrants it.</p><p></p><p>On another scale you have good and evil. Good is defined as people who as a general rule place other people above themselves. It doesn't mean they give away all their possessions to more needy people or anything like that, but rather that they care about the wellbeing of their fellow man. Opposite to good is evil, that is people who overall place their need above those of others. Sometimes good people do selfish things, and sometimes evil people do selfless things, but overall they can be categorised as being either selfless or selfish. In between the two you have neutral people - people who may one day help a starving man but the next day take away his only piece of bread. They weight each decision on an individual basis, and cannot be said to overall be more selfish or selfless.</p><p></p><p>Anyhow, based on how I view alignments I would say that destroying the world would have to be either neutral or evil. You'll have to think about the group a little more before you can place them more precisely, but even if they believe they are doing good they could not really be classified as being good.</p><p></p><p>I can't make any guess towards their lawful to chaotic placement. Again, you have to think of how their organisation works, and of how they interact with their local systems of rulership.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The Horror</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Horror, post: 1958597, member: 26472"] Interesting that you say that. Just two weeks ago I was asked to describe the different alignment options to my players. I described it as something like this: There are two scales. On the one scale you have people that believe in law, order and justice. They believe that there is a system in place and that the system is there to protect their rights. On the other end of this scale are the people who disregard the system. They may or may not understand the system that governs society, or they may see it as flawed and choose to completely disregard it in favour of their own judgement. In between the two extremes are people that understand the system and may or may not understand the need for it. However, these people also understand that rules and regulations cannot always be right and thusly may at times opt to break the rules if the situation warrants it. On another scale you have good and evil. Good is defined as people who as a general rule place other people above themselves. It doesn't mean they give away all their possessions to more needy people or anything like that, but rather that they care about the wellbeing of their fellow man. Opposite to good is evil, that is people who overall place their need above those of others. Sometimes good people do selfish things, and sometimes evil people do selfless things, but overall they can be categorised as being either selfless or selfish. In between the two you have neutral people - people who may one day help a starving man but the next day take away his only piece of bread. They weight each decision on an individual basis, and cannot be said to overall be more selfish or selfless. Anyhow, based on how I view alignments I would say that destroying the world would have to be either neutral or evil. You'll have to think about the group a little more before you can place them more precisely, but even if they believe they are doing good they could not really be classified as being good. I can't make any guess towards their lawful to chaotic placement. Again, you have to think of how their organisation works, and of how they interact with their local systems of rulership. The Horror [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is wanting to destroy the world really all that evil?
Top