Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 3688805" data-attributes="member: 18280">Exactly.I just want three things from WotC.  In order of importance, they are:1.  Publish more things that I am interested in/can use/make prepping the game easier.2.  Publish or lisence to publish a print version of Dungeon & Dragon.  This is actually a heck of a lot lower down the scale of importance than #1, above, but I would like a hardcopy monthly that provides ideas for adventure and location creation.3.  Fix the Gleemax ToS so that posting there isn't tantamount to giving up rights to one's work.  This is actually a heck of a lot lower down the scale of imporance than #2, above, because I cannot imagine Gleemax supplanting EN World for me.  RCEDIT:  Re:  WotC growing the hobby.  When I am talking about WotC's relevance, I am talking only in reference to purchasing new product.  Certainly, WotC has done more to grow the hobby than anyone, especially with the OGL and the SRD.  And, while there are a lot of things I've changed in the rules to make them better fit the type of game I want to run, I certainly do appreciate the base mechanics of the system, as well as the inclusion of a skill system that actually works.My house rules and my Game of Rassilon Dr Who RPG are both built off the basic D20 engine, which is a fantastic, versatile system that is capable of so much more than folks give it credit for.  For example, in GoR Dr Who, I decoupled skill points from level, thus allowing me to create creatures quickly without having to do the math required by D&D 3.X.  This means that its harder to guage CRs effectively, but as that game doesn't use the CR mechanic, the whole thing is much faster/smoother re: prep time.</blockquote>

Verification