Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Olive" data-source="post: 370486" data-attributes="member: 1297">wow... what a rude discussion <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> anyway: perosanlly, i voted no. this because i don't think what sir edgar is talking about is mis management. if he said 'is cutting some of the best creative talent from WotC mismanagement' i probably would have voted yes...but i think 3e is great. i think most of the stuff released is great. i wish that D&Dg had all the demihuman deities, and would happily have lost all the 'real world' pantheons, but its certainly better than the original D&Dg, i mean at least it discusses the belief systems of those gods, not just stats.the whole beauty of the OGL is that books like Tome of Horrors can be released! thats why i think WotC is doing a fine job generally.also, while its true that just because we are buying the books doesn't mean that we are totally happy with them, i think that the fact that 3e books are selling better than 2e, and the number of people who are playing DnD again, as well as those who are excited about it more (like me) as a result of 3e shows that we're in a lot better place now than we were 4 years ago, even if there isn't an official yeti conversion <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>

Verification